Pretty much the subject line. uBO has successfully blocked the nag screen enough times that I can’t play anything at this point. No preview loads, and the play button serves no function. I’d really prefer not to have to find content on YT, copy the URL and use Piped/Invidious, but this ongoing escalation is steeling my resolve to screw Google.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    401 year ago

    I usually do this:

    • refresh uBo caches
    • delete all site data of youtube (in the shield thingy left of address bar)
    • close the browser

    Mostly always worked

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    371 year ago

    -No issues on Firefox+ubo on desktop. -Revanced for mobile (android) -Snarttubenext for tv. Amazon fire TV and any android box.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      261 year ago

      So… They’ve been A/B testing this the whole time and will continue to do so. Do you think OP is lying or could it be that you’re having the B variant until it flips for you too?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        OP most likely is not following the instructions laid out at the uBlock subreddit. Probably a conflict with another adblocker.

  • TehPers
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 year ago

    Been using Freetube, and I even get watch history on it without needing to enable a “use my watch history for advertising” setting. No issues so far, but I don’t watch in higher resolutions so no idea if that would cause any issues.

    Someone else already mentioned LibRedirect, I have that setup to link to Freetube.

    • Wild Bill
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I always watch in 1080p and there have been no issues for me so far at all. I love Freetube.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    Revanced hasn’t had any issues throughout this. I only watch YouTube on Android anyway.

    (doesn’t help for desktop use, but it’s an option and maintains all of YouTubes native functionality + premium features)

  • FlumPHP
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    You could pay for the service with cash instead of ad views. Works on all devices without having to set up an adblocking VPN or Pi-Hole.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      I don’t think you can be sure they’re not profiling you for advertising on other sites just because they’re not showing ads on YouTube. The purpose of uBO is security. Plus I wouldn’t give money to a shady company like Google anyway.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I am, as it happens, but I don’t feel under any obligation to.

          Firstly, how they get paid is a private matter between them and YouTube, they signed their contracts, not me.

          Secondly, YouTube could run privacy-respecting non-targeted ads. I’m not punishing YouTube for having ads, I’m punishing them for being spyware.

      • FlumPHP
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        YouTube doesn’t stop you from using uBO if you’re paying.

        • 4dpuzzle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I think the ‘shady company’ part of paying is an important consideration.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Correct, if they weren’t user-hostile, it would have been more likely I would have built up some good-will towards them and would be happy to pay.

    • 4dpuzzle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      For everyone who feels righteous by paying YouTube for content, here are some things to consider:

      1. A part of your payment goes to Google - who is involved in unethical and often illegal subversion of privacy and user rights on the internet by corruption of the very foundations of the web.

      2. They’re coming up with their ‘content is not free’ argument after they’ve killed off all their competitors. They’re in a position to demand because they played a bait-and-switch and succeeded in it.

      I’m not against paid services, and especially not against paying the content creators. But when you pay a crook for their services, you bear responsibility for their actions.

      • 4dpuzzle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Congratulations on doing your part in helping a filthy spyware company ruin the web for everyone with their corruption of browsers and the web standards.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          I never use Chrome or anything Chromium based. You sound like you use Brave.

          But if someone offers me an entertainment service at a price, I pay, or don’t use it. You’re not some noble pirate, you’re just a cheap ass who wants to consume other people’s hard work for free.

          • Chris Remington
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Please, remember our only rule here at Beehaw -> Be(e) nice. Name-calling is NOT nice.

          • 4dpuzzle
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You sound like you use Brave.

            You assumed wrong.

            But if someone offers me an entertainment service at a price, I pay, or don’t use it.

            Oh boy! Another one with the comprehension skills of a mole rat! Where did I say don’t pay the artist? What I don’t like is the pimp middleman in between.

            You’re not some noble pirate, you’re just a cheap ass who wants to consume other people’s hard work for free.

            Says the shill who parrots the words of an abusive and corrupt corporation. Go look at the mirror and call them cheap ass. You are just a self-righteous idiot who helps monopolies gain control over ordinary people, including the artists you supposedly support.

            • Chris Remington
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Please, remember our only rule here at Beehaw -> Be(e) nice. Name-calling is NOT nice.

              • 4dpuzzle
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Please check again who started it. This is TERRIBLE moderation. I’m out.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              If you don’t like “the pimp middleman in between”, I can only assume you exclusively consume your entertainment on subway platforms and pay with dollar bills, which is great, and good for you, but I like to support creators and live a comfortable life. Some of my money goes to Bandcamp, Patreon and Google. You do you.

              “Mole rat”. haha, cute. I’m not worth your top-shelf stuff, trust me. Save it for your English teacher.

              • 4dpuzzle
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                can only assume you exclusively consume your entertainment on subway platforms

                After Google killed all the competition with ad-free unpaid service for so long. Market manipulation with bait and switch.

                but I like to support creators and live a comfortable life

                Like I said - you’re self righteous. You have no clue how much the creators and web as a whole lost due to the greed and treachery of this horrible company.

                I’m not worth your top-shelf stuff, trust me. Save it for your English teacher.

                You are not worth anything. So keep patting yourself on the back.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Family plan split three ways comes out to about $7 a person per month, if I’m remembering right.

    • Pete HahnloserOP
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      This looks promising. Just the fact that it autopings the list of servers on demand solves much of my Invidious frustration.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    I’m using FreeTube and NewPipe to view now. Yewt.ube is working on iOS devices in Safari with 1Blocker. Firefox and uBO is my last option if I happen to click a link that opens automatically.

  • HooPhuckenKarez
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    I’ve had on and off problems with YT. On days where uBO is behind, I right click and open in private window. It’s a shitty workaround, but it works.

  • tuckerm
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    I’ve noticed that the nag screen never shows up in a private tab. In the last week I’ve gotten in the habit of right-clicking a video and choosing Open Link in New Private Window. It’s not very convenient, but it has been working.

    • moon_matter
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Isn’t that because all extensions are disabled unless you explicitly turn them on for private windows? uBO is off so you obviously won’t see the nag screen.

      • tuckerm
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I just checked and I do have uBO enabled for private windows, so I’m not sure why it isn’t getting caught. I started doing it because I noticed that YouTube was giving one “free” view per day, and then your second view would get the nag screen. So I figured the private window might make you show up as a new person each time, so you always get the initial nag-free video.

        But it seems like the nag screen shows up even on the first view now, so I’m not sure why this private tab trick is still working.

        • moon_matter
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Then I guess it’s just down to cookies? Private doesn’t transfer cookies from the main session. You start with a clean slate all the time.

          • tuckerm
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Then I guess it’s just down to cookies?

            I assume so. But I don’t see why they would need your main session’s cookies to tell if you’re using an ad blocker. I’m guessing this is still something left over from when they were giving you one nag-free video per day, so private tabs will probably see the nag screen too eventually.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      Its just not that you want to pay a company that sold your data and stuffed ads down your throat. Like, at all. Will they still track you using Premium? I am totally certain.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    This ad blocking tug-of-war game is absolutely fascinating in so many ways. One cannot help but be entertained by the two sets of opposing engineers fighting each other for technological dominance

    I love it