• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      481 year ago

      If I owe the bank $1000 that’s my problem, if I owe the bank $73,000,000 that’s the banks problem.

      • Pons_Aelius
        link
        fedilink
        241 year ago

        assuming it’s even him paying for it.

        I seriously doubt he has spent dollar one on this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Not from that anyway, he’s parted plenty of his dipshit cult followers from theirs with it though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        Exactly. Socialize the losses via a big faceless corporation, while consolidating the profits via donations. It should honestly be considered embezzlement.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    851 year ago

    It’s essentially a defederated Mastodon instance. Quite impressive that it can it lose 75 million.

    • Eager Eagle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 year ago

      if I had billions I’m sure as hell I wouldn’t buy Twitter

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        221 year ago

        I’d disappear into the hedges and nobody would ever know my name.

        Fuck that whole ego stroking “hey I’ve got to start a space tourist business to sell rides to space for other rich narcissist assholes”.

        Nope, I’d disappear onto my own island or huge land reserve, and have an army of accountants and lawyers to ensure I remain anonymous to the larger public.

      • Spaz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Which is why you don’t have millions!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      They’re flawed people.

      I would stop at £1M. I’m not going to earn more than that before I die. But free time is far more valuable.

      Everybody has different goals, but honestly does anybody even need to pass £10M. Broken hoarders is what they are.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    59
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can someone explain how this website lost millions? Given that this size was not that big, I fail to see how it could cost this much in admin and Server cost. Even some better known commercial shops will hardly hit 5digits in monthly server costs, plus salaries for 1-3 admins and support staff, and maybe advertising costs.

    37million sounds like something they pulled out of thin air, maybe for some bookkeeping fraud or tax write off…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      Some people gut very lucrative contracts out of it. Some influential public person endorsing this shit heavily? Pay him big money. Really big money. The biggest money ever seen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Especially since they’re just using existing software, they’re not even implementing their own…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You are forgetting how much Trump has to pay Tim Apple. SAD!

      Very unfair, but he is looking at it strongly

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    I’ve sat for a while meditating on this, and now I come here to share the fruits of my mental labor. The comment I’ve been working on for hours is: lol

    • Alien Nathan Edward
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Picture OP in a lab coat and glasses, staring pensively at a blue liquid in an erlenmeyer flask. Behind them is a whiteboard with “LPL LXL L?L” written on it. The world awaits, breath held close as a mother holds her newborn.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    Was it meant to make money? I mean, I think it’s just basically like old fashioned campaigning materials and propaganda, it’s just taking on the new interactive dimensions of social media and the perpetual campaigning of modern politics that Trump particularly is known for. Really it’s “profit” would be measured in outcomes rather than dollars, just as ad campaigns track numbers.

  • 👁️👄👁️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    Wtf did that money even get spent on? They just used mastodon code, so they needed like one or two coders. Traffic was shit so it can’t be that much for hosting.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      $23M of the loss is from the first half of this year. There was a $10M regulatory settlement and another $11M spent on “legal investigations”, which covers the bulk of that. I don’t have the time nor the inclination to really dig into it, but you can look at the filing here: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001849635/000119312523276045/d408563ds4a.htm

      They lost $50M last year. I haven’t looked at that filing so I don’t have a clue what they spent that on besides $5M on “legal investigations” in the first half.

      This company is a total scam. It’s basically a slush fund for Trump. What would probably be more of a bombshell than the spending is where the money is coming from. It’s all but guaranteed that it’s primarily foreign money. Probably also some rich MAGA wackadoos buying influence.

  • Gazumi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    Their acounts going from the green, heading towards the red. Currently mired with the orange.

  • Alien Nathan Edward
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    eh, the next filing will show that it made $200 billion. The one after that will insist that it never existed in the first place.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Don’t care about him so I didn’t even bother… but congrats to him! As elons dead bird side lost way more haha

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Seems like a low cost way to lock people into your viewpoint. Way cheaper than traditional advertising