• octoperson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ll defer to actual paleontologists (or anyone who drops links), but my guess is T-Rex could go a month without food easy. Most modern large reptiles typically go a long time between meals.


    Edit: following the intense scholarship in this thread, I have changed my stance. T-Rex probably would not survive a month without food (or water). BUT ALSO, the entity setting the rules and betting 500 mil on it surviving is going to know that. So the Dino’s getting fed either way.

    • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m also no dinologist, but wouldn’t the T-Rex be used to higher mix of oxygen in the atmosphere? I wonder if it would just pass out from hypoxia

      • LeafOnTheWind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought O2 was higher during the time of the dinosaurs? Maybe that was earlier… I don’t remember when the time of the big bugs was.

        • Pipoca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Big bugs were in the carboniferous, about 350-300 million years ago.

          Dinos didn’t evolve until about 240 million years ago, and didn’t take over the world until about 200 million years ago. T Rex evolved quite late as far as non-avian dinos go, only about 68 million years ago.

    • Gort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Unlike modern reptiles, the T-rex was warm blooded, much like their close relatives birds, so their metabolic rate would be higher than, say, crocodiles, lizards, turtles, etc. Their food needs would be way higher than cold blooded reptiles, so a month without food would be more challenging. Might survive a month if it gorged itself beforehand, but quite likely not.

      • octoperson@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now you mention it, the rules don’t say that you get water.

        And, it only says you get food. It doesn’t explicitly say that the T-Rex doesn’t. You could argue it wouldn’t be a fair fight if he didn’t.

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure it would be possible for such large animals, they require a lot more energy to keep the heat up due* to larger skin surface.
      I could be wrong though, happy to be corrected.

      • octoperson@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Square-cube law would be in effect - for large animals, things that scale with mass or volume outpace things that scale with surface area. Though what result that would have in this case I can’t quite puzzle out.