• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    331 year ago

    Ironically I would support religious studies in schools. BUT…

    Only if they teach ALL of them. And I mean all. Like ancient Greek, Roman, Indigenous, Pagan, Hindu…

    I mean let’s teach kids how long this bullshit has been going on for, how many different ideas there are and how the only positive thread amongst them is the idea that we are all one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      Here in Sweden I had a mandatory religious class. They teaced about Hindu, Buddhism, Christianity and so on. We pretty much learned of all the “major” religions and i would say it was pretty beneficial to us all. Did it have shortcomings? Yes, but it was better to get a broad perspective on things instead of just one thing to be teached as “true”. We also had history parallel with religion which tied them both together pretty nicely.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Without taking too much liberty, can make an assumption? Sweden has a high level of secularism because of this eclectic education when it comes to religious teaching.

        Would that be your assessment?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          I would say that it is probably one of the reasons. Another is that you are just not thaught about religion as a way of living and more just like any other subject like physics or history. It’s more of a objective look at it and what makes up that religion. Like, Hinduism believes a and therefore does b while Christianity believes c and therefore does d and so on.

          It also helps not being raised by religious people of course.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      That’s what we did at my Highschool. Our prof taught us about various religion, including Lavey’s Satanism.

      • ditty
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I’m from the Midwest and I took AP World History which included learning about: Hinduism, Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Christianity (origins, Catholicism and the Reformation), Islam, Buddhism (& Zen Buddhism), and Taoism. Non-AP world history students would’ve also covered some of those too. And this was a public high school.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Grew up in the UU (Unitarian Universalist) Church and I’m eternally grateful that this was the religious education they offered.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        So this is a spiritual belief with humanitarian ideals mixed with Judaism/Christian idolgy?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It originated from Judeo-Christian ideology (Unitarian as in rejection of the Trinity and Universalist as in everybody is saved), but it encompasses all (benevolent) forms of belief and non-belief now. Super religious or atheist, as long as you practice not being an asshole to the best of your ability, you’re welcome.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I agree. Also if someone wants to be religious, they should know about all the options out there and decide what fits their views best instead of being railroaded into the religion of their family.

      It’s like being born into a Republican family and never being exposed to the views of democrats, you just always vote Republican because it’s what your family has told you is the way to do it.

    • credit crazy
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Honestly I’ve been ok with religions so long as the people who believe don’t equate religious =good. Being moral should always be more than just believing someone will punish you for being bad. the reason religions have hells is to motivate people to be good people. Not to be the definition of morality. And sadly a lot of religious people forget that. What you pray to should effectively just be your culture. Like your choice of clothes or the songs you listen to. Zealoty is the only reason I’m not religious myself.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Imparting a morality is not the same as belief.

        Most religious people don’t have a view, they have a belief.

        Belief is okay, but imposing morality is fucked.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    331 year ago

    Makes sense to teach the basics of most popular religions and those locally/culturally relevant. It’s just useful information. Helps in understanding other people.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Here’s how it goes down:

      Do you want to teach various creation myths and explanatory myths? That stuff goes into cultural anthropology, or if there’s enough of it, such as Hellenic mythology, then a literature class, but then it’s cross referenced with the values of the age. No-one wants their modern religion taught as mythology right next to others that are regarded as ancient superstition.

      Do you want to teach existential questions and morality? Awesome! We have entire school departments dedicated to philosophy. Typically 101 is an intro to existentialism and 102 is an intro into morality. And both of them move beyond religion in the very first chapter. The thing is, religions assert their positions on why are we here? and are property rights evil by mere assertion. Ministries say we have the authority, and you obey. and might even back their position up by scripture. But none of this really answers either why or how we know and even Descartes (a devout follower of the Church) couldn’t find a sufficient answer to his own evil demon except to assume by God is good by default (rather than God being a construct by which a corrupt Church might manipulate their flock). Religion turns out to be a starting point for our purpose, the point of everything and right and wrong, but where we end up after the enlightenment is far beyond the apologists.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          I don’t even know what the basics of christianity are anymore. Do you teach it is a monotheistic religion or a polytheistic religion that changed its mind. Do you teach it as them believing humanity stemmed from adam and eve, or adam and eve were the first christians and their 3 sons were to spread the beliefs but acknowledge that humans already existed on earth created by other gods/means. You break bread and it is literally the body of a man, or figuratively. 40,000 versions of christianity that found reasons to not be the same sects. So I suppose you teach a historical touching of how it has changed but by no means could you teach the concepts of Jesus before highschool without upsetting parents these days, even then. Imagine the response to forgiving all drug users, imprisonment being wrong, not having any spending money, etc. Angry parents pissed off claiming schools are teaching Jesus was “some sort of communist.” Was banking not against christian law as well, as you could not ask for interest and such as a true christian would have given it to you without expectation?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Usually there’s some watered down descriptions about different denominations you could teach. No need to get into the nitty gritty of them all, just the very basics and some stuff that makes them different.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      That’s how they did it at my college in the Netherlands, which has ‘Christian’ in the name but really isn’t religious at all.

      You basically got a primer on the big religions as well as some of the fringes. This was part of my journalism degree. I am fully atheist but honestly didn’t mind since it was just factual information.

      They also encouraged us to at least once visit a church, synagogue, mosque, etc. The ONLY one they didn’t want us touching was Scientology after they had some negative experiences in prior years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I went to a Protestant school in Northern Ireland. Learning the differences between Catholic and protestant churches did more than if neither was taught.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Comparative Religion has been an academic subject for centuries as has Religious History. It’s not hard.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    Where I live you can choose between a mainsteam religion or ethics class.

    Since my parents didn’t have to decide it I always choosed ethics, in order to don’t have to deal with hyper religios teachers, who only belive in “the one true religion”, in the end I had to deal with them anyway

    • Karyoplasma
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Same here, but my parents chose that I go to Religion class until they had no say in that anymore (age of 14 where I live). Then I opted for ethics.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    I think a course covering religion should be taught in schools. Roughly the way I would structure it is 2x a week for 12 weeks. 10 weeks on the 10 biggest religions of the world, 1 week on a religion that is not in the top ten globally but it locally important or historically important to the area, and 1 week teacher’s choice.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sounds like you want religious studies and not theology. It is taught many places but usually first appears in high school or you can get degrees in college. I can’t speak for how they break down their study guide, I’m sure they all vary a bit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      would be good for cultural awareness if nothing else. You could mix and match the concepts you like from each religion so you take something away from it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      10 weeks on the 10 biggest religions of the world, 1 week on a religion that is not in the top ten globally but it locally important or historically important to the area

      I’d say it should be the opposite - learning about the culture around you is more meaningful to learn about your own roots (even if you don’t believe it it, knowledge is useful).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I remember needing to learn about different mythologies of different cultures in English classes throughout my time as a student, sounds like a more structured, modern version of that.

      Now that I’m thinking back, I do remember one American teacher I had (this was not in America) who taught us “The Bible as Literature” back in middle school and am only now realizing she was probably trying to convert us.

  • Seraph
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    I demand all school children submit to Zeus.

  • Dr. Coomer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Of course all religions. And they should also point out the ways people abused then as well as how the ideas may have been misinterpreted.

      • Dr. Coomer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Also that. You know what? Why not also the shit people made up, like Dantes inferno making hell look like a realm of pure fire and lava.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    This is what happens in the UK. We have religious studies in high school, and all the main ones across the world religious are taught.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I really enjoyed RS GCSE. It was the thing that best equipped me to interact with the many, many other cultures I’ve encountered in the real world and in my industry.

      I have almost nothing else nice to say about the British education system but they definitely got this right.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Those who want religious dogma taught as truth want their own doctrine taught. And just as they’ll crab about Zarathustra, they’ll complain about unitarianism. They’ll proclaim univocality and literalism when scripture has neither of these properties according to the academic consensus.

    Teaching religion as established truth is indoctrination, and religious ministries commonly have no qualms about it, admitting their own access to truth is only by assertion and fiat, and through no other authority than force.

  • @trackcharlie
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    The education system is a system of the state and the state should be athiest to allay the fears of all incompetent morons who believe in imaginary friends.

    All religions spend billions a year to make and maintain their own places of business (church/mosque/synagogue/etc), if they want to continue lying and manipulating their children they can do so on their own dime.

    Everyone pays for the education system and the education system needs to remain objective and teach empirically researched FACTS.

    If people want their religious texts read in school it can be done in a philosophy or fictional literature course.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Sure, we can teach all of them. You know, Baptist, Methodist, Episcopal, Presbyterian…all types!