U.S. issues warning to NVIDIA, urging to stop redesigning chips for China::undefined

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    641 year ago

    The second Nvidia came out with that press release about a special China-specific version I was expecting this to happen. Honestly, I’m not quite sure what they’re thinking. Congress is CLEARLY trying to control the export of this technology and limit the access the PRC has to it. Trying to end-run what will likely become an ITAR issue (if it isn’t already) is an objectively bad corporate strategy. The penalties for that sort of thing are fucking serious.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      381 year ago

      Absolute boneheaded move by NVIDIA. Guess they just saw dollar signs and stopped thinking. What I don’t get is they are already at like 300% capacity I don’t think there will be any business short falls from selling only to US customers

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think it’s quite clever actually.

        They clearly realise that if China can’t buy their chips, the CPC will put the full force of a planned economy behind making their own. Once that happens cheap Chinese AI chips will eat their lunch.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Everyone thought that would happen with Huawei. What actually happened was a whole bunch of major countries banned Huawei imports and a lot of the ones that allowed them in are having second thoughts. Germany, for example, is in the early discussion phase to remove Huawei equipment (which is already deployed) from their cell network.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Exactly. They want to maintain their insane margins with their oligopoly. The second you get a viable cheap competitor, it will all come crashing down.

          Of course, it’s a massive undertaking to catch up enough to be feasible. But China has the manufacturing experience, and a government initiative could allocate an insane amount of resources behind it if they were motivated to.

          So it’s obviously in NVidia’s best interest to deter it with appeasement.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Also I assume things move much faster there unlike here where every move needs to be scrutinised and approved by 400 different people on 350 different committees.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                Depends. Most of them turn into inefficient corruption at every level. China is a bit unique where they have corruption at every level, but also fall in line or get axed whenever there’s a big initiative that has too much visibility.

                Results vary widely. But at least things get made, big and fast. Quality on the other hand…

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Sure, both will be, corruption is an inefficiency. But the authoritarian society is more egotistic, imo because of the power structure and hierarchy. Like companies meddling in politicians is an inefficiency existing in both

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Really, the only big market that is being targeted by the restrictions is Mainland China (pointedly not including Russia because it’s honestly not a very big market compared to like… New York State or Texas or California). Nvidia would have been fine.

        I think you’re right: they got greedy (shocking, I know)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Large tech companies have been known to buy out smaller competitors before they become a threat or before somebody else buys them out. Not being able to do so with a government-funded Chinese company, I imagine killing the idea before it takes shape is a prudent business decision.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        What I don’t get is they are already at like 300% capacity I don’t think there will be any business short falls from selling only to US customers

        Because capitalism is about making EVEN MORE the next year. And EVEN MORE the year after that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Look, I know we made it your legal obligation to do everything you can to maximize profits for your shareholders, but we didn’t even give five minutes at the time to consider the ramifications of that decision, and now we would like the leopards to stop eating our faces.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Who coaches all these twats into using exactly the same gestures and gesticulations during every fucking speech, it’s all so empty and fake.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Its called profit driven captialism. Same reason why sancations on Russia worked out so bad. Oh, we can’t sell to Russia. Bummer. Ayo look this new Armenian company is making a huge order! Splendid!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is just like the “designer drugs” thing where regulation can never keep up, right? You can always make a new product that falls outside the current definition of what’s restricted but inside the definition of what your customers want.

    The government can’t win without completely forbidding the export of electronics tech to China.

  • @trackcharlie
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    Nvidia is actively supporting our adversaries abroad with their military technology, should be arresting the entire c suite