Very difficult to discuss with the fiance without know the terminology yet lol
just call them communities (I also sometimes just call them topics because that’s how they’re called in my reddit clone pet project)
Lemmings!!!
But aren’t WE the lemmings?
Surprisingly philosophical
Dude… You just blew my mind. (ʘ ͟ʖ ʘ)
Communities, which have a parent instance.
Sub-Lemminal messages?
I like this one
that’s brilliant actually for a mobile app name
@falcoignis On KBin, they’re called “Magazines”. Not quite sure if I like it. lol.
Because you fill them with bullets (posts and comments)?
Idea for next social media platform: call them circles.
One more: exactly like lemmy but call them rooms.
Another: exactly like every other one but call them… groups (ups, you might have to fight google though - “groups” might be trademarked!)
Sorry for the sarcasm, but shouldn’t this be set in the spec for the fediverse protocol already?
Didn’t Google have Circles?
I’ve seen sub-lemmy being used which is cute, but has the obvious ties to Reddit. I guess we all get to work this out together!
Work what out? They’re communities. Not sure why there should be a different name to them honestly other than their official name.
Agreed. Communities make sense and is easy to remember.
I like communities. I believe that’s the the /c/ stands for
The use of ‘comm’ and ‘comms’ as short form for communities makes the most sense to me. Lemmy’s url path already uses /c/ as the designation as well.
Like ‘sub’ and ‘subs’, they are one syllable, and are easy to say and spell.
If someone says “comms” I’m going to think “communications”
but I guess that also technically works ^^
officially, per protocol, it’s Groups. but that sucks :)
isn’t that an ActivityPub term, not a lemmy term? usually ActivityPub uses different terms than the servers that use it.
Yeah, in the lemmy source code they are called “Communities”; in the kbin source code they are called “Magazines”; I think Mastodon uses the ActivityPub lexicon and also uses “Groups” in it’s source code. I perfer “Communities” because that is how the “Groups” are being used.
I just thought they were called “communities”. At least, that’s what the Lemmy UI shows.
So “coms” for short?
Commies
🔨
⚒️✊
I feel like if the short version isn’t “sub” then it is never going to stick. Reddit doesn’t own words but it has set the standard. Sublemmies. That’s what it is in my mind now.
+1 for Communities, since that’s what they are called in the official UI and documentation
I like Lemmings. Has a ring to it.
I’ll just call them sublemmys
Lol I quite like it, at one point reddit was a foreign weird sounding word
I think this is the clear winner
Way more fun than communities! Plus it speaks to the Reddit exodus in a bit of a tongue in cheek way.
It’s a nice lighthearted nod to the exodus, and also a nod to the subforums that came before Reddit. Communities may be the “official” name and I try to use it when talking to others, but they’ll always be sublemmys in my head.
I think using Communities is respectful to the people that were already doing community on Lemmy before the exodus.
Its prefect, I think the “trade name” for that is “sub” anyways and that’s what they will be called no matter what they are suposed to be called.
Lemmings
If anything I think that’ll be what us users end up calling ourselves.
communities
They’re communities. And the different servers/sites are instances.
new to lemmy…
if there different “linux” communities on different instances? does this mean i have to subscribe to all of them? is there a way to see all content from communities called “linux” from different instances?
or does each “linux” community simply fight for critical mass to become the “main” linux community on lemmy?
thanks
I don’t dislike the idea that there could be multiple similar communities (for example Linux communities) on different instances. That way if you have beef with one you could sign up to another; in a non-ideal world that strikes me as healthier than having one to rule them all and lots of people bitter about it. I think it’s best to leave it to sort itself out organically.
There could be different linux communities on different instances, and to see them all you’d have to subscribe to them and sort by subscribed view. But yeah, in practice most of the time there will emerge one “main” linux community and, if it gets big enough, likely offshoot communities for different philosophies or more specificity.
A “merge identical” option in the individual users’ ui would be kind of neat, to have one page.
That does sound like a good idea, kind of like Reddit’s old multireddit function.
Petition to name them SubLemmys
I like communities, honestly, it sounds much less… y’know, reddity?
And also, it’s much more intuitive.
Instances also need better names.
What would you call gmail vs hotmail?
Providers.
But that’s a provider/customer relationship, on the fediverse it isn’t.
Agree on a technical level, but in terms of the average netizen being able to visualize the relationship, “providers” makes it much easier
I don’t think we should try to visualize something that’s not there just because it’s (supposedly) easier for the average netizen.