• AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thing is, you have to measure from the user base on the underside, this graphic obviously uses the wrong method.

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Here too there are misconceptions!

          What’s important are the hard numbers, soft metrics like user count are misleading! Some may look large at first, but hardly grow with higher engagement, while in others engagement greatly increases the size.

          • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            True. Related to that I wish there were more engagement on lemmy. Most of the posts in my stream have zero replies or 1 and it’s the bot. But let’s keep smaller numbers - quality over quantity.

      • Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not always

        Lemmy still doesn’t create enough content that I want

        But I try to use lemmy more anyways

        Hopefully more people will use lemmy more

    • Kokesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. Quality is the key thing about fediverse. Also - size doesn’t mean everything. Black holes are small, but mighty. Lemmy sucks most of my spare time already.

      • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My take away from this is lemmy is so good it’s actually a gravitational singularity pretending to be a social network