• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    The Internet hatred for furries always bothered me. I’m not into it, I think it’s weird, but so what? I think BDSM is weird too, but we don’t treat people into BDSM like we treat furries- as if they’re some sort of disease. I’ve met a few working at sci-fi/comic cons over the years and they’ve always been really nice, decent people. They just have a kink. Lots of people have kinks.

    • FirstPitchStrike@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I think it’s the fact that furries tend to bring their kink public. I have not consented to engage in your sex games. If he showed up to a ceremony in leather and a ballgag no one would be ok with it, but the fur suit is the equivalent and I’m expected to applaud.

      • randon31415@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        2 years ago

        You sound like the kind of person that wants to ban drag story time at the libraries because “kids shouldn’t be exposed to someone’s kink”

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          So the distinction I feel here is that women are people. If a man wants to dress like a woman, sure, most people can interact with women in public, whatever. If you want to call them both, broadly, a form of cosplay, then drag is a costume that doesn’t fundamentally change much. Animals aren’t people.

      • Jimbo@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        The fursuit is the equivalent??? I’m actually laughing rn people think this???

      • Madeline@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        A big part of this misconception is actually from That Episode. You can actually google the phrase That Episode. No need to even specify the show, just those two words are enough (but the show is CSI). There’s a bunch to read into if you’d like, but the important bit is that a big part of public opinion - which has only recently begun to change, and only in some parts of the internet - comes from That Episode’s portrayal of furries

      • Serinus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        2 years ago

        the fur suit is the equivalent [of] leather and a ballgag

        I mean, no. It’s really not.

        I do get what you’re saying and generally agree otherwise. That one was just a bit much.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          I agree. I’ve seen furries in public and while I find them odd, I never saw any of their costumes as inherently sexual.

            • Azal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Some do, many don’t. A fursuit is a costume, as a cosplayer in fandoms do, and I guarantee there are cosplayers that have sex in their costumes.

              Knowing quite a few fursuiters there’s less of them that want to have sex in suit because it’s hot as fuck, makes you a lot more clumsy, and those suits are expensive as hell as they’re custom made.

      • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 years ago

        Would you say the same about police officers, nurses, nuns, motorcycle wear and so on?

        If the body isnt indecently exposed i find it hard to draw the line, since everything and nothing is someones kink.

          • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            We established that there is sexual and non sexual furries. As each of my examples is both non sexual and sexual for some people, it is impossible to deem the one as right and the other as wrong on that basis.

            Interestingly it is you, that seems to consider animal suits and behaviour as a sex thing. So maybe you need to own up to your kinks you little furry.

    • Salami456@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I blame the astroturfing early on. The furry community never really overcame the weird allegations from their first major convention. It also doesn’t help that people think furry is JUST a sexual thing.

      • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Imma level with you chief: I would think it was less weird if it was JUST a sexual thing.

        • Pohl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 years ago

          “I like to wear a cartoon animal suit when I go to the grocery”. —> weird, but you do you I guess.

          “I get into some wild and depraved shit when I’m horny” —> me too buddy, me too.

    • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      Furries are odd fellows, but they steam a good ham make a good cooling suit.

      It ain’t for me, but I do somewhat respect that they have a hobby they’re all-in on.

    • Jimbo@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      And many replies here are people hating on furries, and people actually thinking fursuits are primarily a sexual thing, this is wild lmao.

      From someone actually from the community, fursuits are NOT a sexual thing for the VAST majority of furries, and should not be treated as such. Can’t believe I still have to say this.

    • TheEntity@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      we don’t treat people into BDSM like we treat furries

      I mean, unless they ask for that.

    • wheelie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sure they’re all nice and great people but I can see the other side, comparing it to BDSM it would be like going to work in a gimp suit.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      People who are into BDSM keep in the bedroom. It’s not like they are going out of their way to wear their costumes.

      Furries want to wear their costumes every chance they get.