• VeganPizza69 Ⓥ
    link
    fedilink
    4311 months ago

    This is a great illustration of the problem (biosphere collapse). Not optimal, but better than the usual ones.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -411 months ago

      Definitely not optimal with what seems to be the domestic cow as one of the cards at the top.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1011 months ago

            You’re not wrong about the second half of your sentence, but it is quite common, unfortunately. Besides, I think the cow in the picture is meant to be representative for the entire meat industry, not just beef (other meats are still terrible for the climate, of course, just not as bad as beef).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1511 months ago

      Good, I hate mosqitoes anyway. Said unironically by some dipshit crayon eater everytime insect collapse comes up. Is it possible to slap someone on the internet?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 months ago

        Mosquitoes specifically can all fuck off and die without anything really noticing. Anything that uses them as a food source has other options. They provide no net benefits in the way bees, spiders, worms, or basically anything else does.

        The rest of the multi-legged realm is kind of really fucking important.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        Half of humans that have died, ever, died from malaria.

        The biggest ecological impact eliminating mosquitos would have would be the increase in human numbers when the main vector for that disease was eliminated.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          Thinkimg about it, more humans is a terrible ecological effect as of current lifestyle and economics norms.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          I will bite and answer seriously:

          It will have no impact on others, and even it did, it would be minimal.

          However, suicide rates sometimes spike when someone famous comits die and with that it hasn’t brought mankind cose to extinction.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Yeah sure, let me just launch the nukes that I don’t have in a second. Or I could release the *NEW* COVID-23 DS Pro Plus Black Edition… aww fuck I don’t have a lab either to create a lethal virus.

          Sorry, can’t do at the moment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      Even though things seem shitty now. I think that, on average, humanity’s story is one of self-improvement. This Good Place quote comes to mind:

      What matters isn’t if people are good or bad. What matters is if they are trying to be better today than they were yesterday.

      I think humanity is trying to be better today than it was yesterday. Human history is a story of more and more types of people being given more and more rights. Of slowly putting down our rocks and spears and guns and trying to live together. Of learning to care for nature while holding the power to destroy it. We’ve had backslides, but overall we’ve come a long way from the Apes we once were.

      I think humanity deserves the chance to keep trying to better itself. I hope we get to the point where we are good enough to give ourselves that chance. As another scene from Good Place put it:

      Come on dummy, faster.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      511 months ago

      I’m kinda thankful that even if we kill ourselves off and most life on Earth, it’s almost certain that life will come back in full eventually. We’d have to do some real Earth -shattering stuff to prevent that.

      • @Fapp
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I argue this point all the time and no one ever likes it. In order to eternally prevent as much suffering as possible, we need to cause a vacuum decay event. Otherwise something is always going to evolve to take humans place and then we’re in the same shitty boat.

        Edit: just realised you were saying that was bad, oof

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          That’s nice because it is always hard to find motivation for fundamental sciences. Stopping all suffering for good is so honorable! Particle physisics should include it in grant proposals.

  • MrZigZag
    link
    fedilink
    811 months ago

    Honestly I wouldn’t miss mosquitoes (at least the ones that bite humans).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You wouldn’t directly no. Except it’s food for a lot of animals and would be a huge problem soon enough

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    211 months ago

    Can someone make the connection for me between mass insect die-off and civilizational collapse? Whenever I see this implied there’s research cited about why we should believe insects really are in trouble, but the rest of it is always handwaved. I looked it up and it seems like a large portion of crops do not actually require insect pollination. So wouldn’t that mean we would survive, albeit somewhat worse off, even if much of the ecosystem does not? Am I missing something here?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Every species is a food, resource, predator, or competitor for resources for another species, so a decline of one species can have ripple effects on many other species. I guess one example is that parasitic wasps keep caterpillars and aphid populations in check (caterpillars and aphids can cause huge crop losses).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        I get that there are ripple effects, and that some of them might be unexpected, but I don’t see how it could translate into an apocalyptic scenario for human agriculture. If there was somehow an increase in the population of pest species, why wouldn’t variations on the techniques we already use for dealing with those (which mostly do not rely on other animals) ultimately work to handle it, at least enough to feed everyone?

  • Norgur
    link
    fedilink
    011 months ago

    One exception: wasps. Those useless stupid motherfuckers can go extinct. Fuck’em.