• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2459 months ago

    Must be nice to be able to have a tantrum in court, yell at the judge, and then just be able to walk out.

    I encourage everyone to try it sometime.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Terms and conditions: Offer valid only for white or orange. Participant must be a republican or identify themselves as a republican. Offer not valid for women, children, and people of color other than orange, and poor. Don’t be poor.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        139 months ago

        He might be one of half a dozen people who could get away with that in a US federal court.

        I wonder if Elon could get away with it.

  • Drusas
    link
    fedilink
    1429 months ago

    Justice Engoron, in a plea to Trump’s attorney, Chris Kise, implored, “Mr. Kise, please control your client.” However, the attempt to rein in Trump proved futile as he continued his tirade, even bringing up the prosecutor’s alleged political motives, including what he called her “failed” run for Governor.

    Should have charged him with contempt.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      119 months ago

      Then some asshole judge in East Bumblefuck will charge Biden with contempt, for reasons

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1019 months ago

        So? If you let fear of fascist reprisal stop you from upholding the rule of law, then they’ve won.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        119 months ago
        1. So what?

        2. Biden is not on trial. This would be an apparently senile judge yelling at the wind.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        99 months ago

        This happened in Illinois, some downstate dipshit judge was going to hold the governor in contempt because of emergency declarations during COVID times. It was a political stunt by this jackass named Daren Bailey who then ran for governor and lost. Him and this other dumbass named Dan Proft are funded by the Uihleins who own Uline and are constantly trying to cause problems.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        Wait a minute. Judges can’t make the right calls because other judges might make the wrong call?

        So the answer is for the first judges in question to make the wrong call?

        This is what happens when you engage in mental gymnastics. Things just stop making sense unless you’re an idiot.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    117
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Disobeyed Judges orders so hes gonna be held in contempt right? Were not going to keep reinforcing to this child that he doesn’t get any consequences right? . . . right? The US Justice system is doing this to itself, and every day it proves itself inadequate to contain this threat.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      429 months ago

      I agree that they’re doing it to themselves, but it’s not that it’s inadequate. It’s that they aren’t treating him like a mob boss. They are presuming he has a shred of human decency and isn’t a psychopathic narcissist ready to burn it all down out of pettiness and spite.

      They’ve prosecuted mob bosses before, so they simply need to change their paradigm.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          29
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          So the threat of political violence has tangible results on the rules of justice? You know that only encourages more political violence right? It’s “Might makes right” with like one extra step. No one willing to die for Trump is going to care if he goes to jail now or next year they will do what they will do. But changing procedure because of them means their threats are working, which means the US Justice System, is not.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              19 months ago

              Do you honestly think he supporters care? They don’t believe in truth, nothing a lawyers says or does is goning to change their mind. All the justice system is doing is showing them violence works. If thats the justice system you want then we have fundamental differences on what justice is.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Then ‘reality’ is settign the stage for bigger coups and more stochastic violence from fascist leaders. This mentality you seem to think is ‘reality’ is not an preventing violence, it’s just kicking it down the road to the jext judge, the next governor, the next person they target. It’s MORE dangerous to do what we’re doing now. You’re very nonchallant for someone to whom reality means violence gets you what you want.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          109 months ago

          Let it happen. If they couldn’t do it on Jan. 6th, they’re not going to be able to do shit now. They’re all goddamn cowards and anybody that commits violence in his name can get locked up right alongside him.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            6
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Better squash it now than let them know threats of violence get the intended result I say. Their response isn’t gonna change because the case is more bulletproof, they don’t believe in truth anyway.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          89 months ago

          That’s a very good point I’ve only just really let sink in. Trump not passing go and going directly to jail will mean chaos and collateral damage, perhaps globally. Things have to be done delicately for all our sakes unfortunately.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            119 months ago

            You don’t think that the current approach isn’t causing chaos? He literally forged documents to send imposters into the electoral college vote. His supporters stormed the capitol - beating and killing security personnel and in one case being shot dead by special services. I don’t think that jailing Trump will make these issues go away as they’re too ingrained already, but I do think a harder stance needs to be taken before there’s no more ground to stand on.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I do. He needs to go to jail eventually, or at least be made ineligible to run for office, or both. But if law enforcement locked him up tomorrow I think that could be immediately destabilizing of American society and the ensuing riots could cause massive loss of life and destruction, if not all out civil war, frankly. The cult of Trump is not insignificant. I live in New Zealand, and even here I encounter Trump pariahs all the time. We are living in very interesting times.

              The asymmetry here is the most frustrating thing, but building things has always been harder than tearing them down. Dealing with Trump and the cult surrounding him, and the phenomena that actually made him possible in the first place (social media and the outrage and misinformation economy that has infected news media and the entire information space), is probably going to be the project that defines this decade, and that all other projects depend on for their success (like dealing with climate change). So it’s one that if we fail, could set us back to the early 1900s or worse in terms of global societal cohesion. I don’t think I’m being hyperbolic when I say this.

              • Bizzle
                link
                fedilink
                English
                39 months ago

                I see a lot of people (who are not Americans) speculating on the prospect of an American Civil War Part II, but I live here and I’m not seeing it. That’s what Jan 6th was supposed to be, and it didn’t work. The people that like him are like him- loudmouthed blowhards with no critical thinking skills. There will be no civil war. Our democracy is broken and our politics are a joke, but there’s not going to be full out war over this. We eat too well.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  I hope you’re right. The fact all the polling data puts Trump at an almost 50% chance of being re-elected if allowed to run is not encouraging, and it’s almost like the closer we get to locking him up (or out), the more popular he becomes.

                  His followers lack critical thinking skills. But so does the overwhelming majority of the population. That was really my point.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    979 months ago

    He should have been arrested, cuffed, and hauled off to be locked up like anyone else.

    Instead everyone will continue to coddle him, emboldening his jackass followers as if this course is somehow favorable to consequences.

    • Lemminary
      link
      fedilink
      329 months ago

      Why is this a thing?? I don’t get it. It’s so stupid. Anybody else would get their ass handed back to them but he’s the exception for some reason I can’t fathom. Like, even if he has a lot of followers, so what?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        309 months ago

        In this case, to give absolutely zero room for mistrial complaints that the judge was biased against him.

        And guess what? He has zero room for complaints. The judge has handled this pretty much perfectly.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          to give absolutely zero room for mistrial complaints

          My man standing up on the desk, pulling down his pants, shitting all over the place, then waddling out with his pants around his ankles and the judge turns to the bailiff saying “No no no, let him do his thing, I don’t want to risk a mistrial”.

          He has zero room for complaints.

          He’s been indicted 91 times since he left office and we’ve yet to see any of them resolve into some kind of legal punishment. Everything is supposedly coming to a head between March and May of this year, but… In the middle of a heated election season, I’m not holding my breath on that shit getting deferred or extended or whatever.

          And then if he makes it to November and wins (hardly unlikely, given the direction of the current polling) he’s back to being Unitary Executive and immune to prosecution. And then we’ll get four more years. And if the country doesn’t collapse on itself after that, we get to restart the whole process and hope another four years of pretending to indict a former President now pushing into his mid-80s will mean anything.

          Guy is going to die of poor health long before he sees the inside of a jail cell. The US justice system simply is not built to punish people like him.

        • Lightor
          link
          fedilink
          69 months ago

          Yeah I think this is a case of “go ahead cry, you lost, game over”

        • GladiusB
          link
          fedilink
          -109 months ago

          I mean he was the President. As much as I hate the guy and think he is an awful leader he still has privilege above ours. Life has politics EVERYWHERE. His boss. His family. His community. There are certain things this judge has to balance in every decision.

          I don’t know the judge or the details of the case. But you ask why he is hauled off? Because MOST white old guys that fuck up are just slapped on the wrist, pay a fine, and do community service unless he actually was violent. Did he perpetuate violence? Absolutely. Has that been proven in a court yet? No. It’s not so black and white.

  • Melllvar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    639 months ago

    Why is he not sitting in a cell for contempt of court?

    The judge is setting a bad precedent that is going to be used every single time he tries to hold anyone else in contempt ever again.

    • Lightor
      link
      fedilink
      169 months ago

      I think this is a case of “I know you’re going to appeal and say I was bias. They’re going to look at how much I let you do and get away with and laugh in your face.” I think she’s playing the long game.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        Couldn’t anyone else that was held in contempt for doing the same shit down the road use this in their appeal though?

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Not directly. Judges have significant discretion over their courtroom decorum and procedure.

          If the judges decisions on stuff like this are reasonable, they are upheld, even if it’s applied diametrically to two identical litigants.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        09 months ago

        I dunno, giving special treatment to certain defendants doesn’t seem like “the long game” to me.

  • Adderbox76
    link
    fedilink
    English
    549 months ago

    I’m not going to pretend that this is some grand strategy by Trump. He’s an immature man-child and that’s all there is to it.

    But there most certainly is a strategy by his lawyers.

    If their client somehow manages to make the judge “lose their cool” its fuel for an appeal/mistrial. So they really have no interest in ACTUALLY controlling his outbursts.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Isn’t it typical for a lawyer to be held in contempt for not following court rules? Will there be contempt proceedings near the end of the trial?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        I’ve never heard of a judge doing such a thing at the end or after a trial, but it would be priceless to see the judge run down the laundry list of actions taken or not taken by the attorneys that they would be receiving fines for.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    53
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    This title is hilarious compared to others I’ve seen. Makes it seem like shit was crazy. Like they’re trying to top the guy who superman’d over the bench last week. It wasn’t. He spoke and the judge let him. And the judge will make his decision soon so let’s see how the EXPLOSIVE UNHINGED ATTACKS work out for him.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      129 months ago

      Yeah I was going to say, “stormed out”? I’ve never seen a courtroom where the defendant could just leave, especially not in a case that’s this high profile.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      119 months ago

      I’m guessing the only explosive or thunderous thing that happened was just Trump shitting his diaper as he waddled out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      79 months ago

      this article- which I skimmed - seems like a left-leaning Fox News. Like massive hyperbole and exaggeration designed to get rage clicks

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        59 months ago

        Unfortunately that’s the devolution of most media now… It’s ridiculous.

        No no we can’t be the media or the press and simply provide information, we are ad revenue companies masquerading as the press.

        Right, left, center, whatever. It’s all devolving into click bait shit.

      • vortic
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        Looking at it, it seems worse than Fox. It seems closer to Gateway Pundit or some awful shit like that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        69 months ago

        Not that I’ve seen (doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist), but other coverage I have read makes it seem way less dramatic.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    439 months ago

    Did anyone expect something different? He is a big child that never learned the meaning of tbe word “No”. He simply cannot accept that someome sets real limits to his doings, so they must be wrong.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    439 months ago

    Definitely the actions of an innocent man. Lmao he’s such a loser, and sore one at that. Hopefully they bleed his criminal organization dry with the verdict

  • ivanafterall
    link
    fedilink
    359 months ago

    He stormed out because he shit himself. Again. And was stinking up the courtroom. Again. If you watch the video, you see him holding his butt and waddling.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    349 months ago

    Call your Senators and Congressmen and tell them this shit is unacceptable. Call over and over until their aides are sick of hearing your voice. Even if you aren’t in the same party and you didn’t vote for them. Let every gov’t employee know enough is enough.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      Call your Senators and Congressmen and tell them this shit is unacceptable.

      Hello, Mr. Ted Cruz? I’d like to file a complaint abou… Oh, go fuck myself? No, that’s fair. I’ll just dial Mr Crenshaw and… Nope, it appears I’m being told that this phone call is uncivil and I can go fuck myself. Okay, well, you’ll be hearing from my vote in a heavily caged and gerrymandered set of districts.

      Call over and over until their aides are sick of hearing your voice.

      Daily screaming matches with some telemarketing company paid to handle their calls will do more harm to me than to any of them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      19 months ago

      Call your Senators and Congressmen and tell them this shit is unacceptable.

      This has never had any impact on anything and idk why you people are so deluded into believing otherwise.

      DONATE (bribe) to your representatives. That’s what they listen to.

      I guarantee, not a single senator will read anything anyone here ever sends to them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      💸

      I remember when a judge gave a girl a harsher sentence just because she was smiling.

      Justice for the rich is not the same as justice for the poor.

      It’s another reason why every poor person who thinks the disparity in wealth should continue to grow is a fucking idiot.