[email protected]@sh.itjust.works to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agoAnon goes apesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square33linkfedilinkarrow-up1382
arrow-up1382imageAnon goes apesh.itjust.works[email protected]@sh.itjust.works to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agomessage-square33linkfedilink
minus-squareJokklMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up43·edit-21 year agoNo because this is classical operant conditioning not Pavlovian. Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
minus-squareRodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up25·1 year agoPavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
minus-squareDaefsdeda@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 year agoI think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
minus-squareJokklMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThis is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.
No because this is
classicaloperant conditioning not Pavlovian.Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
Pavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
I think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
This is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.