• Meeech
    link
    fedilink
    295 months ago

    As soon as I saw the right wing conspiracy theories about KC winning, I knew something was going to happen if they won. It’s such a sad state we’re in when a sporting event is politicized.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      65 months ago

      Sounds like it was a dispute between a handful of teens. Why these dumbasses decided to bang it out with all those people and cops around is beyond me.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    225 months ago

    Nothing can be done, says only nation where this happens regularly.

    If there are no sharks, there are no shark fatalities.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    215 months ago

    Well, it is the USA after all. It is no good American party without some gun action, it seems.

    • @Fapper_McFapper
      link
      95 months ago

      Republicans fought against gun control legislation, they did nothing after Sandy Hook Elementary.

      Republicans did nothing after Sandy Hook Elementary.

      Republicans did nothing after 20 children aged six to seven years old were gunned down with a Bushmaster XM15-E2S rifle at Sandy Hook Elementary.

      Republicans will continue to do nothing.

      Just remember, if you’re ever caught in the crossfire, thank a Republican. If you survive.

      You want to live? You want to let your children go to school without worrying about them being killed by a mass shooter? You want to go to the grocery store and come back home alive? STOP VOTING FOR REPUBLICANS!!! It is literally that fucking easy.

      Carry on.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        115 months ago

        Republicans didn’t do “nothing” after Sandy Hook, they did the most republican thing they could do: advocate for arming school children and staff.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        In a Reddit thread about this, someone got so mad when I pointed out they were wrong about the Sandy Hook shooter owning his guns, even though that’a a critical piece to implementing saner gun control: checks on the purchaser would have accomplished nothing here, as his mother bought the guns. You’d need to take a different approach, like free public mental health care (or repealing the second amendment, but that’s much harder). One of the first steps toward even attempting saner gun control laws here is working out what’s going wrong. shaking my head

        Anyway. You are right, but not right enough. We need people like Bernie Sanders in charge if you want to see meaningful change in gun control.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          Bernie wasn’t much of an anti-2A advocate until he ran for the Democratic bid in 2016. Align with party values or get out.

          Our country is sick. Healthcare is inaccessible and right out unaffordable, the Bible belt vilifies science, education is both piss poor and stupid expensive, we’re the richest country on the planet but a tiny handful of grubs are hoarding all the wealth, something something preaching to the choir.

          People wouldn’t commit politically motivated domestic terrorism if living here wasn’t made intentionally shitty by the people in charge. I want our planet to stop burning, but they’re only focused on revoking trans rights or whatever fabricated problem they’re whining about this week. Americans need to wake the fuck up and stop being so complacent.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        I think it’s more fruitful to address why people go on killing sprees instead of trying to prohibit the tools that they use.

        To this day, it doesn’t make sense for someone living in rural America to be against gun ownership because they have to rely on themselves for their own protection.

        That said, there are legitimate arguments to be made for allowing cities to ban gun ownership.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      185 months ago

      Some 75 people have been killed and 140 have been injured in the 44 mass shootings from Jan. 1 to Feb. 12, according to the Gun Violence Archive, which considers a mass shooting an incident in which at least four people, not including the shooter, are injured or killed.

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/mollybohannon/2024/02/13/us-mass-shootings-hit-3-year-low-for-first-six-weeks-of-2024-but-deaths-remain-high/?sh=2af2256b209d

      But don’t worry. Mass shootings stans will go, “Well askually it’s not a mass shooting because…” So the number depends on if the person

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        it is darkly hilarious to me that shooting one person or two people just doesn’t count as a shooting any more.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          Of course those count as shootings, just not mass shootings. There have always been too many shootings to count - especially in the 90s, mainly due to the war on drugs. There has been an uptick in “mass shootings” in recent years, mainly because we didn’t differentiate them from “shootings” until relatively recently…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            35 months ago

            I mean, “mass shooting” used to colloquially mean a random act against the public. I feel like people still think it means that when they see stats like this, but practically all the shootings in this stat are from gang violence and organized crime. A drive-by is a mass shooting.

            Not to downplay the severity of it, but I hope people aren’t thinking that there have been ~45 Kroger type shootings this year already. Solutions that address crime like this are different than addressing sick, politically motivated domestic terrorists. Not to say we don’t need a lot of both, though.