• phillaholic@lemm.eeEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      You neglected to include what should be done with the terrorist group that started the conflict by invading and killing a thousand Israeli citizens. It’s like you’ve read one side of the conflicts view point and ignored the rest. So you know how many times two state solutions have been negotiated and why they fell through? It’s really difficult to compromise when some people don’t think Israel should even exist. I don’t expect you to solve it, it’s impossible. There’s hopefully some good news coming out today https://apnews.com/article/palestinians-abbas-israel-hamas-war-resignation-1c13eb3c2ded20cc14397e71b5b1dea5

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.comEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        I’m no foreign policy expert, but a 2 state solution seems like the only viable solution that doesn’t involve a genocide and eradication of an entire country and people. Sure it might require international intervention to establish a DMZ like what happened towards the end of the Korean War (from a US perspective) but it would at least stop the senseless killing and greatly reduce the suffering that’s happening right now

        • phillaholic@lemm.eeEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          Clearly that’s the ideal, but getting that done is next to impossible and many of the surrounding countries that are bank rolling Hamas don’t want to see peace. It’s very difficult to fight a war against terrorism. Afghanistan/later Iraq proved that.

        • 0x0@programming.devEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          Better nuke the site from orbit, it’s the only way to be sure… no humans will keep killing humans in the name of one god or another. Make it all radioactive, done. One week’s warning.