“we’ve waited too long to open the aperture on the solution sets in terms of what we need, as a society, to start reducing emissions,” Woods told Fortune

Archived copies of the article: ghostarchive.org web.archive.org archive.today

    • Bizzle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it playing devil’s advocate to say that criticism should at least be true?

        • Bizzle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          Awh I’ve never been called a class traitor or a corporate boot licker before 😂 good to know that we’re willing to throw the truth under the bus, I always thought that being better than our enemies was the way but I see now that petty things like the truth are the real enemy. Thank you for opening my eyes.

        • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          What the fuck, what kind of bullshit is this? This is not how a sane discourse works. This is the worst case of ad-hominem/strawman I’ve seen in a while.

          “Yes, OP, you’re right that the CEO didn’t say that. But do we need the truth prevailing here? He’s a CEO!!! Why are you defending him?!”

          What a load of bullshit.

              • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You don’t do that for the poster. You do that for other readers.

                When someone makes a completely stupid comment, like “Drink bleach to kill viruses,” I won’t go and reply “no you wrong!” I’ll reply “For anyone reading, that’s a dangerous advice and here’s why [citations].” I don’t care if the poster then replies with “nuh uh, fake nooz.”

                (I didn’t downvote you, by the way.)