• Valen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      479 months ago

      When closed captioning for TVs was being rolled out by government mandate in the US, there was widespread anger over having the cost of a TV increase by $0.25 for everyone for a feature that would only help a few. I was sickened by the callousness.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        30
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Plus people rarely know in advance that they might become disabled later in life, so they are shooting themselves in the foot by protesting when they are lucky enough to be able bodied in the present day.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          209 months ago

          They won’t be able bodied for long if they shoot themselves in the foot! Seriously though, some people refer to abled body people as TABs, which stands for Temporarily Able-Bodied, to drive the point that advocating against or ignoring issues which negatively impact people who are disabled may include themselves in the future.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            109 months ago

            I like that and will start using it. We’re all pretty helpless after birth and before death, so being able bodied is just a temporary phase in the middle, for those lucky enough to not be born with a disability or acquire one in the middle of life.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Huh, I’ve not read of that before! That definitely fits with what I was wondering, and points to other terms that may apply as well (universal/inclusive design). Thanks!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    619 months ago

    I believe it’s called Universal Design. You can hear about that and curb cuts specifically in eps 308 of the 99% invisible podcast.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    50
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    One of my coworkers was talking about how his wife (a truly hateful woman) was complaining about having been to a bathroom at a particular airport, and how they had changed them for trans people (she presumed). In particular, they had made all the stalls have floor-to-ceiling doors for privacy. I responded “wait… she’s mad because they made the bathrooms better for everyone, because they did it for trans people? That is an objectively better bathroom situation. I can’t imagine being upset by that.”

    People can still manage to be upset, but if they did do that for trans people (and I’m honestly not convinced), that’s fantastic, and is a perfect example of what you’re talking about, I think.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      189 months ago

      Not to mention the ramp is easier to clean off and less dangerous once you clear and sand/salt it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    139 months ago

    “The curb effect” for the little Ramos people made on curbs for wheel chairs, that turned out to be useful for delivery people, baby carriages, bicyckes, etc

  • BrerChicken
    link
    fedilink
    129 months ago

    In the disability advocacy community, we like to say that accessibility is for everyone!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    79 months ago

    I tend to think of it as positive synergy but you’re right, it does need a more defined/known term.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29 months ago

    Affordance? I’ve heard of it when talking about tools or utensils that are universally usable.