• alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    3·
    1 year ago

    That was explained earlier in the program:

    A state and government “of, by and for” the workers must replace the capitalist state. The foundation of any state power is repressive force—the military, police, prisons, courts and so on. The standing army and police must be disbanded and replaced by the armed people, organized in workers’ defense councils. A critical task of the new socialist order will be defending itself from the displaced capitalist class that would like to return to the days of exploitation. A workers’ government would create an entirely different type of court system, with its basic institutions determined by the democratic organs of workers’ power. Judges would not be required to be lawyers. All public officials, without exception, would be elected and subject to recall at any time by those who elected them.

    It’s certainly not self-justice. Mob-rule is just a term liberals use to justify anti-democratic mechanisms to protect their own power.

    • AAA@feddit.de
      4·
      1 year ago

      Thanks. But no thanks for the downvotes. When asking to be questioned, expect to be questioned.

      And mob-rule is not a just a term invented by the liberals. But because a group of vigilantes took matters into their own hands - by arming themselves.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        2·
        1 year ago

        Yes it can mean that, but that’s almost never what is referred to when liberals bring it up as a reason for our institutions to be less democratic.

        You can go all the way back to the founding fathers for that one.

        When asking to be questioned, expect to be questioned.

        It wasn’t for questioning, it was because you didn’t at least skim the article for anything pertaining to your question.

        But honestly even opening link and scrolling to the bottom of the pamphlet is still better than 99% of exchanges like this so if I was grading on a curve, you’d still get an upvote.