Comparisons aren’t exact matches but the relationship still stands. Individuals are tied to both, ideology they both share exists.
You’re trying to paint them as two totally different things and they’re not. You’re comparing apples and pears
Comparisons aren’t exact matches but the relationship still stands. Individuals are tied to both, ideology they both share exists.
You’re trying to paint them as two totally different things and they’re not. You’re comparing apples and pears
I’d still say it’s related
The sons of liberty didn’t set up America but they certainly played a huge role.
And likely some people were involved with both.
It’s like you’ve never used the Internet before.
This is your fifth lap.
Delete the comments then accuse me of lying. Sure bozo
How does that change my statement?
Removed by mod
Source? I’d love to see
No that’s usually because he’s like involved with shit people somehow
Grandad wandered into the wrong thread somebody wheel him out
Damn this one is brutal
Made this joke at work. It’ll be
I still actually do believe the Internet will start producing worthwhile information again. I’m noticing patterns of the Internet being useful and filled with dogshit and back to useful.
Just give those wonderful Indian dudes some time to make more YouTube videos on every subject
This is the complete most idiotic, moronic and stupid argument ever presented in my like 20 years of being a dumbass arguing on the Internet.
Donald Trump is different so he didn’t steal the medal.
This is your argument.
No. He stole the fucking medal and the other guy understood all of what you’re saying, decided it isn’t worth it and moved on.
But he stole the medal.
I guessed 34.
Historically. Do they give those medals to other country leaders or nonplayers.
Find that answer and the truth will be yours
You’re like really mad about this while being completely obtuse. Relax.
The Mujahedeen weren’t as organized or as unionized, they were scrambled together to fight the Russians. When that was over another imperial force was pushing onto them, now organized they sort of merged with radicalized groups to form what is the Taliban. I had to Google his name but Jalauddin Haqqani is an exact example of what I mean, cut his teeth fighting Russians and moved to fighting US/NATO.
The ideology they share is main entire reason they were fighting in the first place that you’re completely overlooking. The entire reason any of this happened. To fight imperial powers, to remove them from their country. Which is the same thing the sons of liberty wanted hence the comparison.
They’re not vaguely nonsecular afghan paramilitaries. They’re people motivated to fight western influence and were lining up under dozens of labels to do so.
How is this hard to understand?