@Bitrot yes, but not only your devices. The corp hosting the data for you does have access to the unencrypted data. They can log into their systems and see the unencrypted contents. EEE will parent a 3rd party from reading g your data while I’m transit, but not once it has arrived at the final destination
Mark :debian: :tux: :python:
Biological nerd from the Milky Way galaxy.
:linux: and #foss enthusiast.
Interests:
- :linux: :debian: :python: :docker:
- #dataprivacy
- #foss
- #containers
- #selfhosted
- #cybersecurity
- 🇸🇻
- 🎶
- 1 Post
- 16 Comments
- Mark :debian: :tux: :python:@fosstodon.orgtoPrivacy Guides@lemmy.one•What are the recommend changes to make iPhone more private?0·2 年前
- Mark :debian: :tux: :python:@fosstodon.orgtoPrivacy Guides@lemmy.one•What are the recommend changes to make iPhone more private?1·2 年前
@MagneticFusion @chemicalwonka I was gonna suggest the same thing but I realize that only solves half of the problem. You would still have to identify to apple services to download and install the app
- Mark :debian: :tux: :python:@fosstodon.orgtoPrivacy Guides@lemmy.one•What are the recommend changes to make iPhone more private?1·2 年前
@nitefox @adespoton doesn’t EEE imply that decryption happens on both ends?
- Mark :debian: :tux: :python:@fosstodon.orgtoPrivacy Guides@lemmy.one•Reflectacles to escape Facial Recognition4·2 年前
@learningduck @chairman Great!.. so just wait for everyone else to buy these first
- Mark :debian: :tux: :python:@fosstodon.orgtoPrivacy Guides@lemmy.one•How many Adblocking/Privacy extensions are too much?0·2 年前
@9point6 @Ogygus
Brave is owned by a for-profit company that makes money from its users.
Isn’t this true for most browsers? The fact that you speak of ‘market share’ implies profit for somebody at some point. In most cases Google, Microsoft, Apple, Mozilla or somebody. Good for you for deciding who you want to support, but you make it sound like there is something wrong with it being owned by some corp…when the same is true for everything else
@fraydabson Thanks for the explainer. I was recently tempted to try it out but my certs end everything is managed by NPM and didn’t really have the time to redo my whole setup but it looms interesting
@fraydabson @krdo been curious about caddy before but I have no reason to switch from nginx-proxy-manager. Has anyone got any experience with both of these ? How do they compare?
- Mark :debian: :tux: :python:@fosstodon.orgtoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•What can I do to make this more secure?1·2 年前
@jws_shadotak Make sure no ports other than 80 and 443 are exposed from the outside and force everything through https
- Mark :debian: :tux: :python:@fosstodon.orgtoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•Home server crashing randomly2·2 年前
@WhyAUsername_1 Thanks!
I recently had a similar experience with one of my boxes… similar specs also. Im my case it turned out to be a disk going bad. Unfortunately It was the one / was on.
It did take a while to figure out the problem though, but you may want to take a look at the
atop
tool. If anything, it will help you rule out disk issues.
- Mark :debian: :tux: :python:@fosstodon.orgtoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•Home server crashing randomly2·2 年前
@WhyAUsername_1 Which OS is this? and can you share the important specs of the box?
@midas Were you self-hossting or using their hosted service?
- Mark :debian: :tux: :python:@fosstodon.orgOPtoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•[@selfhosted](https://lemmy.world/c/selfhosted) I self-host a few services on my box, but I'm looking for a 'dashboard' like solution to use as a portal to click to each of those. I've seen this befor1·2 年前
@Bjornir Looks great! Thanks 👍
@Jarmer @Milarepa_07
I, too, settled on 2FAS a while back, primarily because I don’t like this type of thing being hosted online at the mercy of someone else.
@MasterBuilder @HughJanus
+1 for OsmAnd, although for routing, I find Organic Maps to be a little snappier on the UI and feels more like ordinary routing apps.