i am still around, and i do log in fairly regularly, just havent posted in a bit

for the nsfw patch itself? probably just some code to halt stuff like blur for nsfw posts and the such. i dont think there is much going on changes wise with the patch. otherwise it is just built on top of the lemmy-ui. IMO

github.com/lemmyNet/

and if you want the specific issue that was this vulnerability: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/1895

im ok with it, try it at the very least. i have been just trying to keep up new posts to the community a bit is all with the image posts (mostly because they are creators i follow and they typically their newer stuff). the worst that could happen is down votes.

to add to this, even though i did not look at every one, the subreddit had stories on there and i liked the variety

huh, same as my luggage

according to these rules, its on a case by case bases that would be up to the mods/admins of what they feel about the piece and its context. if any of them dont feel comfortable with it for looking too young, will be removed. atleast that is how i read it.

e.g. the rebecca/midna shortstack argument that is brought up in these comments

TBF, the current rules were made in haste and have only been around a short time to mitigate things getting out of hand, so people could think with clear heads instead of putting out fires. also mods are kind of on a churn since we are still dealing with a user base that sees the new shiny and wants to do something with it before moving on (for various reasons, nothing against those people). so there are the occasional community that has a mod that has not done any posting or commenting in 20 days and active mods are trying to figure stuff out with limited tooling.

not to mention that the new rules go some way to helping with that, leaving the mods/admins to interpret the context of the piece and its surrounding media to determine and if any one of them feels it should be removed, it will be. i also agree with @kellySunshine in this message thread

have you tried rebooting the app?

potentially? i think the AI thing has more to do with copyright then consent at this point though and its something society as a whole is still trying to find the boundaries of

that kind of looks like the app is messing up somewhere, maybe try restarting the app? (closing it out completely and opening it again) otherwise does this work with other instances?

yah, probably best to stay within safe harbor provisions as best as possible

if people want a de-blur before the -nsfwpatch gets updated for the web interface try this:

https://lemmynsfw.com/comment/2219

use the 1.2 version of the script, scroll down a little bit and you will need something like tampermonkey or greasemonkey to run it

this is the way, even things like linux distros do this, fascinating to watch though

to add to this, youtube has the ability to be watched with the NSFW UI patch on lemmyNSFW (one of the added expand features [shows on the site as a book] before the update to 18.1)

This, it’s a server specific patch, give the devs some time to update it and it should probably be back

there was no evidence only allegations (as in the post only had text explaining what the admins were doing before they left chat, no images) in the initial post, the person says they have evidence but does not want to present for whatever reason from above, and as for deleting the only way i have verified that escapes the modlog is the user deleting the post (since i have not been able to get solid info on if a post purge reports to the modlog yet) and the admins say both parties were in bad form for the actions they took with padded posting the allegations and them acting the way they did toward the post with the ridiculous ban. this is all we have as of right now.

and realize that as someone that does not know the admins at all, i dont trust them either but beyond trying to look out for the health of the server and perhaps going a bit harsh on immidate rules they havent been overly adversarial to the community. thus i feel that till there is evidence or actions that say otherwise i dont think we should condemn them to being guilty on hearsay.

about the only thing we could condemn someone for is the unprofessionalism of an admin and the method in witch someone was banned.

tl;dr: at this point it is hearsay till somone makes a move, so it might be best to wait and see what comes out in the wash. the only thing someone did that was factually wrong was ban someone unprofessionally. also, do post purging from admin get recorded in the modlog?

comm: https://lemmynsfw.com/c/monstergirl post: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/193129

or someone decided to stab them in the back after appearing cordial to working together and eventually leaving on what seemed like good terms.

we do not have enough evidence to condemn ether party ether the admins need to act (e.g. ) or the person or admins need to come forth with evidence. so maybe keep the torches unlit for a bit longer.

in short, we have no solid evidence that they actually got called out, or back stabbed. lets see what the next move is first

i kinda figured it would require some sort of verification process so we are not banning people for little reason (a record system of bans from communities on the system, via a ticket or rep sheet) and maybe a script to ban if banned from x number of comms, or after it has been reviewed by an admin. though right this minute might be unrealistic implementing this in the near future

i personally would not mind taking over: https://lemmynsfw.com/c/monstergirl