So things that can already happen. It’s also a huge leap to say that anyone will give ai full control over all computers. That’s like saying nuclear power is going to kill us all because we’re all going to have Davy Crockett tactical nukes. Like I guess that’s possible but it’s so extremely unlikely that I don’t get the hysteria. I think it’s articles trying to scare people to get clicks and views.

Well, enlighten us.

PLEASE TREAD ON ME

I don’t think you remember it very clearly lol

I figured it was a typo

Did you mean to say gentile there

Everyone gets too upset about it. Personally I payed $45 for it, and I feel like I got more than $45 worth of game out of it even if I feel like it’s a total mess. I don’t think it’s a $500m, 15 year game, I guess, but to me it was a $45 game so it doesn’t bother me.

Give me your secrets, lol. I want to love SC desperately but I find prohibitively frustrating every time I die in an elevator for no reason, or my ship explodes randomly, or I’m unable to get up out of the bed, or my character phases into the planet, etc etc etc. Functions on ships just don’t work sometimes for me.

Less bugs than the average new AAA game is just not true lol. I have a lot of fun with SC but it’s a complete buggy mess.

Is there some type of PC that can run windows and also can’t run Linux?

We give them billions of dollars per year in cash and weapons. This blood is on our hands because American taxpayers are funding every bomb. Also “unilaterally” just wouldn’t be true. The overwhelming majority of the international community would also like the genocide to stop.

I think you should deeply reflect on how evil your last sentence reads considering the circumstances.

About the genocide? The most you’re willing to demand from you government is that they ask their client state to stop doing genocide? Sanctions, pull all aid, condemnations, anything. They’re slaughtering civillians by the thousands.

Awful idea

Maybe exclusively isn’t the right word then

I’m guessing not even on the same continent.

Removed by mod

Yeah, I think that any employee who can get away with not focusing should. It’s a symptom of bad management. If a given job is such that an employee can complete all their tasks in 20h of work, they should do that and it’s on a manager to know that and give them more tasks. “quiet quitting” is a bullshit nothing term.

Former employee from the layoffs in May 23. In my experience yes. Lütkes words here are insane as are many of the other recent headlines from the company, but I can say that the severance packages were extremely generous, in my opinion.

The concept of quiet quitting always struck me as bullshit in general. Like if your employees can do that, if they’re able to just sort of log in and barely do anything, then they should. That’s the manager’s fault and responsibility to keep employees engaged or demand more from them. If the minimum amount of work isn’t enough for the manager, then it isn’t really the minimum, right?

I really enjoyed this one. Super cool read.