

Because user freedom and experience is diametrically opposed to corporate control and ad driven profit seeking.
These companies have continued to function on round after round of VC fundraising, diversifying their corporate holdings to the point that theyre basically wall street funds, and providing little innovation past initial product launch. When the stock market takes a downturn they become insolvent and they have to squeeze profit which means squeezing users. They have no choice, most of these business models weren’t viable to begin with.
The truth is, fundamentally the dude is right. The problem is of course that he’s being disingenuous, he’s making excuses to expose himself to children. Seeing some naked dude isn’t a big deal, deliberately showing children degeneracy and trying to pass it off as harmless is a big deal. In the woodchipper they go.
If you let your kid have a smartphone or unrestricted access to the internet you’re probably doing a lot more damage to them than them seeing some guy ride a bicycle naked. Theyre watching porn at 12, by the time they’re 16 they likely can’t even get off without moving images in front of them, and possibly needing to up the stakes as time goes on, graduating to tranny porn and what not. They’re on discord being asked for nudes, they’re in groups telling them to cut their dicks off. You’re a bad parent blaming the world for your failure.
The problem with the naked guy isn’t a naked guy, the problem is that they’re being invited to an event entirely created to showcase depravity, surrounded by people some of whom are there specifically for the children, glorifying self destructive behavior, and deliberately trying to attract children to such an event.