• 0 Posts
  • 44 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle
  • sanosuke001toPrivacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comCan I "trust" DeepSeek?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Name, address, phone number, Bank info, nude photos of yourself, etc. If the info being released could harm you or in some way negatively impact your life, assume it would be sent to China or anywhere else on the world wide web if you ran it without following the previous guidelines.


  • sanosuke001toPrivacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comCan I "trust" DeepSeek?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    25 days ago

    Tbh, if you don’t know what that means, you can’t trust it.

    Though, it means that unless it’s running locally on your own hardware and not in the cloud and you haven’t verified the source code directly (or someone else you trust hasn’t) then assume it is nefarious and do not give it any personal or sensitive information you wouldn’t want anyone on the Internet to know.














  • But a government that potentially is nefariously attempting to block a candidate shouldn’t be able to bar someone from being elected.

    eg. An English loyalist blocks George Washington from being president by fraudulently getting him convicted of a felony; is that a reasonable thing we should have codified in the Constitution?

    Do I want trump to be elected? Hell no. I also don’t feel like we should go down the road where a political opponent can block someone from running illegitimately, either.



  • So, let’s say a political party is somehow at fault for charging and getting a verdict of an opponent. This would make it very easy to block anyone from running against the party in power if they so choose.

    The founding fathers saw how much of an issue this would be so limited the reasons for blocking someone from running for office. I don’t think hush money is a good reason (though, doing so to block info that would make him lose an election I think should be but that will be up to the court)