• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You’re right, however I’d say that Nvidia has always been stingy with VRAM. The 3060 had 6GB while the RX 480 had 8GB, for example, the 970 had 3.5GB VRAM and the R9 390 had 8GB, and there are similar examples going back a long way.

    It has got pretty bad recently. Worse than normal. AI is also very VRAM intensive (even moreso than gaming), so I imagine they’ve been diverting those chips to their AI/enterprise cards.

    • @ReallyActuallyFrankenstein
      link
      English
      16 hours ago

      Well, Nvidia seemingly forgot to price gouge on RAM for the 3060 and they had a 12 GB standard version for a while. That should have been the low range standard, with 24 for mid and 32 for high, but they’ve adjusted.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        They only did that because they were forced by AMD’s VRAM choices and unexpectedly great RDNA2 architecture.

        Because of the memory bus that the 3060 had, it essentially had to have either 6GB of VRAM or 12GB, and it’d have looked stupid next to AMD with only 6GB, so they changed it to 12GB fairly late on in development.

        It led to the bizarre situation of the 3060 Ti (based on the 3070 die) having less VRAM at 8GB.

        So yeah, less that they didn’t want to price gouge, more that AMD was giving 12GB for similarly priced cards that were also much faster, and Nvidia knew that 6GB would look like a joke in comparison.