cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/6400327
In case anyone is wondering, it’s rqd2.
The definition of paraphilia is “a condition characterized by abnormal sexual desires, typically involving extreme or dangerous activities.”, which can inclde pedophilia.
It has recieved 4 censures from fediseer due to the content contained on that instance
Not a good look for Lemmy to be promoting any instance like that.
Update: A pull request was sent to remove the sus instance. It should no longer show up soon
Well that’s disappointing. I was about to spring to their defense about how MAPs/Pedophiles having a sense of community is actually a good thing (see: https://www.thestranger.com/articles/2018/07/20/29453977/online-support-groups-can-keep-pedophiles-from-offending-but-they-keep-getting-shut-down), but I’m not going to spring to their defense if they allow pro-contact views. I only support anti-contact (ie knowing that adult-child sex is wrong). maps