• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Saying “a large part” is just weasling out of the fact that you want to say “all”, but realise you don’t have the evidence.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            That doesn’t even make any sense. Because you, in your wisdom, have decided that I am the kind of person who must believe [x], you are going the believe that I, personally, individually, do in fact believe [x], despite my explicit words saying I don’t believe [x].

            Alternative facts have taken hold of this fucking generation.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Your explicit words have not demonstrated you don’t believe x. Your explicit words express a view very, very close to x. A view that seems, to me, carefully presented.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  I didn’t say anything about how reality works. If there’s something I said that violates fundamental laws of physics, please, explain, instead of simply asserting I did so.

                  Or, better yet, let’s get back on topic.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    There is no topic. You claimed I said a thing. I said no. You said “yeah but you were thinking it”. I said no. You said “I reject your reality”. So here we are. Nothing further to discuss, except perhaps how ridiculous your approach to dealing with the world is.