• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Saying “a large part” is just weasling out of the fact that you want to say “all”, but realise you don’t have the evidence.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          That doesn’t even make any sense. Because you, in your wisdom, have decided that I am the kind of person who must believe [x], you are going the believe that I, personally, individually, do in fact believe [x], despite my explicit words saying I don’t believe [x].

          Alternative facts have taken hold of this fucking generation.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Your explicit words have not demonstrated you don’t believe x. Your explicit words express a view very, very close to x. A view that seems, to me, carefully presented.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                I didn’t say anything about how reality works. If there’s something I said that violates fundamental laws of physics, please, explain, instead of simply asserting I did so.

                Or, better yet, let’s get back on topic.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  There is no topic. You claimed I said a thing. I said no. You said “yeah but you were thinking it”. I said no. You said “I reject your reality”. So here we are. Nothing further to discuss, except perhaps how ridiculous your approach to dealing with the world is.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    You’ve said most homeless people don’t want a home. This is demonstrably untrue, and blames them for their own suffering.