• lemmyvore
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    I’m not sure I understand how your analogy fits. There’s no heavy lifting involved. 🙂 Everything works and it’s ready-made – otherwise people wouldn’t use it at all. There are also lots of distros specifically tailored to audio and studio work. Naturally, there’s some things to learn but you also had to learn things when you got into audio and presumably you keep up with the industry so there isn’t a big difference.

    Check out /r/linuxaudio, lots of resources in the sidebar and very helpful community.

      • lemmyvore
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        There are tools that work on any OS. Audio processing has been developing at an even pace on all main OS (Windows, Mac, Linux). At this point it’s a matter of what flow works best for you. Windows itself is not an industry standard by any means. The OS matters very little in general beyond being able to give you real time processing and low latency. Windows could not even do low latency before 10.

          • lemmyvore
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -21 year ago

            I can throw out names too. Bitwig, Cadence, Ardour, Zebra yabridge Pianoteq etc. Also entire distributions — MX, Elementary, Ubuntu, Mint, Solus etc.

            Is it relevant? Maybe, depending on what you actually need.

            Like I said, there’s no shortage of tools on any OS. If you want those specific ones that you listed and you want to do it on Windows, you can.

            The only thing I object to is saying it can’t be done on another OS that you’re obviously not familiar with.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        Can you now install Mac OS on any hardware? They have the best tools for audio work, right? I can just choose that tool and install it on my… Oh wait! I can’t do that.

        Do you not understand the argument you’re arguing?