• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    108 months ago

    It is hyperbole, but the problem is that it’s using a word that was supposed to specify that something was not hyperbole as hyperbole, rendering it useless.

    • @ReallyActuallyFrankenstein
      link
      English
      38 months ago

      the problem is that it’s using a word that was supposed to specify that something was not hyperbole as hyperbole, rendering it useless.

      … Or… Because it’s a word specifically meant to indicate it is not hyperbolic, using it in that way is literally the superlative hyperbole.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        At the cost of the word’s intended use, unfortunately. RIP literally. It literally died.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          48 months ago

          Now you have to hit literally in the chest with an adrenaline shot to bring lividity into its decaying body.

          quite literally

          actually literally

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            38 months ago

            A good point, I haven’t seen “quite literally” used to mean “figuratively.” Perhaps there’s some usefulness to be had yet.

    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      rendering it useless

      Another example of hyperbole.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      People, including many famous authors, have been using literally this way for hundreds of years.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        08 months ago

        Yes, but its use to mean its opposite didn’t become widespread until the past decade or so.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Incorrect. People have been using it the way you are complaining about for hundreds of years. It’s a new phenomenon that people complain about it being used the way you disapprove of. I’d attribute the recent complaints to lack of literary exposure and anti intellectualism in recent years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      Except some of the earliest uses of the word “literally” that didn’t pertain to letters and glyps we in the form of hyperbole.
      Literal as factual and literal as exaggeration both about the same age and precedent, and have been used long enough that it’s just part of the English language at this point.
      May as well complain about how “discreet” and “indiscreet” are opposites, but “flammable” and “inflammable” are the same.

      https://people.sc.fsu.edu/~jburkardt/fun/wordplay/autoanto.html

      English is a language of contradictions and massively confusing syntax. News at 11.