Any critiques, desire for clarity, outright hatred, whatever have you. I will respond the best I can.
I know there’s been some blowback on some of the policy updates but it’s been difficult to really explain fully that the restrictive content policy is temporary, this community was very unmanaged for a time and it had to be reigned in somehow and with the limited tools at disposal the temporary policy changes were made.
Here’s a comment that also explains a little bit behind the decisions made recently as well.
For community mods, we have a community mod coord matrix group chat now. Feel free to DM about it.
Also, there’s another ongoing discussion regarding SFW communities on lemmyNSFW here.
I know you’ve accused me of “mass reporting”, but it’s because you post a shit ton of questionable content. Like I just submitted a report on this post.
How on earth does this look like consent to anyone? The girl is literally getting shot up with drugs by the mafia.
becouse my wife literally did almost exactly that last night at a club. fully consensually. becouse she likes group scenes with people. admitedly she didnt do hard drugs but she drank. and theres no sign in that that the person is not enjoying it, or did not want it. theres no signs of struggle, no where she was even struck (consensually or not)
So what’s your criteria for identifying an image as rape?
Because with the way that you seem to approach this, everything is consensual.
everything that doesnt show signs of struggle, and where the person looks like they are actively enjoying it. and where there are no signs in the others in the room stating that the person is not willing.
essentially : if there is no evidence they dont enjoy it, and they seem to be enjoying it, maybe they are enjoying it ?/ if it walks like a duck quacks like a duck says its a duck and looks like a duck its a bloody duck
For the other image of yours I reported for noncon (I believe I only ever made two noncon reports???), the girl doesn’t look like she’s enjoying it and she has whip marks all over her body.
From my perspective, there’s not a single item in the picture that suggests that it might be consensual.
EDIT: Actually, I guess it was three reports. I reported this one, which depicts am unconscious woman who gets fucked by the entire tavern after falling asleep drunk – which is rape in my books.
I think the reason I thought you were mass reporting is becouse you reported every character in a school girl outfit you see. So I spend the time researching and verifying their age, then come back to another report that I have to dig through and verify and most the time they have been legal, or ocs without a defined age ik which they are clearly drawn above age.
Tldr I hit a bunch of false positives so I got a not great impression. I still responded to each of your reports, you just weren’t happy with alot of them.
I don’t think you’re being totally transparent/honest here. 9/10 reports that I made on your content, you ultimately agreed it’s legitimate and you removed the image. We can keep score if you really want.
The school girl outfit image I still think is questionable. For this post, if you click on the source manga, some of the school girls are totally flat (washboard chests in a school manga). Even though the artist claims that they’re seniors, it’s hardly kosher when a bunch of girls in the image actually look like lolis.
Also a senior in high school doesn’t mean that everyone is 18+. During senior year, some people might be 18, and others might be 17.
They are blocked at this point, and im not going to go into it in detail but no its not 9/10 i mean youve in this chain complained about more than 1 post i havent deleted for you. I have 800+ posts so yes i have had to delete a handfull. and im not upset with your reporting overall im upset with you continuosly arguing when i disagree with you, or when the wiki’s disagrees with you, or when you make an argument like “canonically she wouldnt do this” or "it must be rape becouse there is drugs in the picture.
Are we actually treating cartoon images as rape now?
Shall we also censor scenes from the coyote and road runner as highly graphic scenes of violence and
deathinjury?According to the instance content policy on the sidebar:
So yes, in drawings, text, audio, or any medium.
Either you’re reading that rule way more stricter than was intended (and reading your comments with a ton of personal bias and prejudice) ; or if you’re reading it correct then this is bonkers, and clearly this won’t be an appropriate instance for nsfw.
I don’t even understand why we went here. I can get being 3times more careful with actual humans and images of actual sexual content. But cartoons/anime/tentacles hentai? FFS…
See admin comment: https://lemmynsfw.com/comment/213410
Yeah…this is bonkers. Both art treated as IRL and the assumption that either the admins or anyone else can figure out noncon. (Not even going to go on on 'underage/lolita anime concept based on some canonical age)
Either there is something in the material that is clearly ilegal or not. Trying to figure out intent/consent out of an image is absurd.
Wonder how long this experiment will last.