• Pleb
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    No. They could have taken a look at what their competition does and start from there. When I’d want to sell a new phone I sell one that has festures of a common phone these days. What I don’t do is start with a brick of a phone and say “Please buy it, I have to play catch-up.”

          • Iapar
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 year ago

            You are missing the point or that is a strawman. The argument ist that it is stupid not to learn from others.

            To use your example: It is stupid to not release a smartphone in the first place.

              • Iapar
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                It makes sense if you interpretate “a brick of a phone” as not many software features. Fewer functions is more brick like.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        Steam pretty much invented online gaming retail.

        Any competitor can and should learn from that instead of starting over from scratch.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            MVP in this market doesn’t mean “make an interface that can sell games” because plenty of those existed alongside Steam and they all died: Discord’s store, Direct2Play, etc… Even now many publishers who left Steam are coming back because the shift to their own launchers went very poorly. Why? Because no one wants to have 6+ launchers.

            You need to either be more than just a storefront and launcher, or offer something Steam doesn’t. GoG did the second by selling old games Steam just doesn’t have. To do the first, you’d have to build an integration with other services… like GoG Galaxy. Huh imagine that, Steam’s only competition that has lasted is actually trying to do more than just be a store.