• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Unfortunantly this kind of data will be misused. I remember there was a big push from my governemnt to use contact tracing apps. Only to find out later that police were using it in investigations.

    • @ReallyActuallyFrankenstein
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What government/country was this, out of curiosity? I thought the whole point of the local-storage-only approach was protecting privacy, so curious how it could be used in investigations.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Australia. Government funded apps, not the Google/iOS implementation. It’s been a few years so I was a bit confused on the details. It is not stored locally which is how it was used.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      well, that’s the centralised implementation, which i also don’t like. iirc there’s a decentralised implementation where, instead of tracking your location and sending it to a central server, each device would have a uuid. whenever you come near someone, both of your devices would just swap uuids and take note of them, and if either of you catches covid, they can just open that list of collected uuids and use that to notify the people who came into contact with them. imo not only is this more privacy-friendly, but it saves infrastructure costs from not having to host centralised servers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Got a source for that? The approach google and Apple implemented was completely anonymous, even with rolling identifiers.