• Montagge
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    I haven’t had any issues with the few snaps I use so far

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      391 year ago

      The issues are more being worse than flatpak in most ways: Proprietary, bigger, slower, no support for external repos

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 year ago

        You had me at proprietary. But seriously, I use FOSS. I’ll tolerate proprietary software if I have absolutely no other choice. There’s absolutely no reason for me to put up with this bullshit. While it’s a long way from the kind of shitfuckery Microsoft is so fond of, it’s still completely unnecessary.

      • Montagge
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Proprietary doesn’t bother me at least not how snap is currently implemented
        I don’t recall noticing a size difference between snaps and flatpaks
        I’ve found snaps as fast as flatpaks, but I know snaps has issues before I started using them

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          101 year ago

          Honestly, if you’re satisfied, there’s not really a compelling reason to switch. Keep using snaps if that’s what works for you. But I would like to remark that we should preferably support open solutions to proprietary ones. That’s not saying that we should never use proprietary software, but just something to keep in mind.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      231 year ago

      I haven’t had any issues with the few snaps I use so far

      My grandpa used to say something like the idea that he never had problems with the ‘few’ times he drove home drunk so far. Then he ran someone over.

      It’s better to understand something is an avoidable risk BEFORE you’re shown graphically.

        • Solar Bear
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Me reacting to analogies with “Did you know these two things are not completely identical?”, completely unburdened by the knowledge that I’m supposed to explain how the differences invalidate the comparison.

          • Montagge
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            Driving drunk is factually stupid
            Snaps are not
            It’s a bad analogy

            • Solar Bear
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I’d argue it’s pretty stupid to use FOSS but then depend on a proprietary server that only one for-profit company is allowed to run to deliver all that software, trusting them to just never do wrong or leave you high and dry. I’d also argue it fits the analogy perfectly, because the analogy was about saying “I haven’t had a problem yet” in response to being shown the potential problems of the action.

              • Montagge
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                But the problem with snaps is an opinion. If Canonical goes bonkers I’ll just go use something else. Until then I don’t have any issues with them using proprietary software within their own ecosystem.

                • Solar Bear
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  It’s not an opinion that proprietary for-profit software will betray you, it is an inevitability. It has happened every single time. If it was FOSS, we could salvage it. It’s proprietary, so we can’t. When it fails it must simply be abandoned. I just hope you learn the right lesson when this happens.

      • AphoticDev
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Comparing Snaps to manslaughter is a new one to me, but why couldn’t you have gone for the Godwin and compared it to Hitler?

    • /home/pineapplelover
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I ran ubuntu for a year and most my packages were snaps. It slowed my machine and made it lag so much. I now use arch btw