@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agoAAAAtomsmander.xyzmessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up1968
arrow-up1920imageAAAAtomsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•1 year ago…96? How is 96 a point of reference when you are making a scale from scratch?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year ago100 is divisible by 5, so what’s your point?
minus-squareℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoEasier to subdivide a physically measured scale when the reverence is divisible by multiple values to choose from…
…96? How is 96 a point of reference when you are making a scale from scratch?
I think it’s because 96 is divisible by 3.
96 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
100 is divisible by 5, so what’s your point?
Easier to subdivide a physically measured scale when the reverence is divisible by multiple values to choose from…