@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 months agoAAAAtomsmander.xyzmessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up1967
arrow-up1919imageAAAAtomsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 months agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]cakelinkfedilinkEnglish4•8 months ago100 is divisible by 5, so what’s your point?
minus-squareℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃linkfedilinkEnglish0•8 months agoEasier to subdivide a physically measured scale when the reverence is divisible by multiple values to choose from…
I think it’s because 96 is divisible by 3.
96 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
100 is divisible by 5, so what’s your point?
Easier to subdivide a physically measured scale when the reverence is divisible by multiple values to choose from…