• meseek #2982
    link
    fedilink
    310 months ago

    Yeah this is so wrong. I read stats claiming only the top 30% make $70k annually or more. That’s basically $4k a month take home. Given rent and bills, that actually likely leaves people with like $1,500 for food and other. Given the cost of food, I can’t see anyone eating on a budget of $200 a month. Even eating moderately costs about $400-500 and you’re likely making most of your meals from scratch.

    And that’s the top 30%. What are the other 70% living like? Because I buy a dozen eggs, some milk, a loaf of bread and I’m down like $20.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      010 months ago

      I think you are looking at individual income where household is more appropriate. The median after tax household income is 68k. So that’s still 50% doing worse, but it’s a little better than you make out.

      • meseek #2982
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        Sorry how is 68k annually per household better than 70k per person? Your figures make the situations worse.

          • meseek #2982
            link
            fedilink
            010 months ago

            Yes but out of a household of 4, you’d theoretically have two people earning $70k annually if per person right? So your stats half the household incomes but only drop the population by 15% give or take. Thats far more bleak.