I originally posted this on the other site back when I took the picture, and it resulted in a lot of confused comments, especially from Americans, eventually getting removed by overzealous mods. Either way, I promise you that this date does not exist, and has never existed.

  • eric
    link
    fedilink
    -31
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m so tired of this “proper order” date debate among regions. Can’t we just accept that there can be more than one correct way to do things?

    We commonly write dates 02/29/23 because we speak or write “February 29th 2023” while in other languages, it’s customary to speak or write “29th of February 2023” leading them to the common format 29/02/23.

    Edit: to curb the ISO standard comments, yes, that is the most efficient and organized way to write a date, but how many of you speak dates in ISO format? If you don’t commonly say “2023 February 29th” out loud, then you intrinsically understand that not all situations call for the ISO standard.

      • Dem Bosain
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Wait, so month comes before day? I’ve been doing it right all along?

      • eric
        link
        fedilink
        -291 year ago

        Please stop. That is another correct way to do it, and I said there is more than one, not two.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          201 year ago

          The reason why it’s superior is (mostly) just because it removes that ambiguity of whether your region lists months or days first. By using a global standard you are still able to prefer whatever method of speaking it, but especially in situations around health and safety the less chance for confusion the better.

          Like, the whole “flammable” vs “inflammable” label is another problem if someone incorrectly assumes inflammable is the equivalent of non-flammable.

          • eric
            link
            fedilink
            -171 year ago

            I am familiar with the ISO format and use it every day. But let me ask you, do you speak dates in ISO format? If not, then you understand it isn’t always the best format for the situation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          111 year ago

          The ISO is an organization trying to get everyone on the same page, they are the accepted standard globally. If you see ISO and you go against it, you better have a damn good reason and you’ll be liable everytime.

          • eric
            link
            fedilink
            -201 year ago

            When was the last time you spoke a date in ISO format? Do you say “2023 February 29th?” If not, you intrinsically know ISO is not always the best format for the situation.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                Neither, it’s become about some guy who needs to be right. Even if clearly and objectively wrong.

              • eric
                link
                fedilink
                -181 year ago

                It’s about the correct standard, which if exists, should be the same whether spoken or written. I’m saying that no such standard exists, and there are different correct ways depending on the situation/region.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  8
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Written has ambiguity, spoken doesn’t. One has to be standardized and the other doesn’t.

                  The topic is about written, not spoken since we all completely comprehend this.

                  • eric
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -10
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I disagree with that assumption.

                    The comment I was originally replying to was talking about the two most debated formats while ignoring ISO for “non-technical” people. Those two formats are that way because of the way people most commonly speak it in the region where they originated. I agree that the best written format is ISO, but it’s not commonly used outside of technical circles because it requires that you say it in a different order than you read it, which proves difficult for a lot of people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 year ago

      I’m so tired of this “proper order” date debate among regions. Can’t we just accept that there can be more than one correct way to do things?

      International Organization for Standardization (ISO) be like:

    • slazer2au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      Written language doesn’t have to follow spoken language. The ISO is for written things not spoken.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        you actually think you’ll be able to convince anyone even remotely stupid or stubborn to use this? you must have never tried anything like this before then…

      • eric
        link
        fedilink
        -101 year ago

        When was the last time you spoke dates to anyone in ISO? If you don’t ever say the year before the month and day, then you intrinsically know ISO is not always the best format for the situation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          Spoken and written don’t need to use the same format. Time also isn’t spoken using the written format hhmmss.

          • eric
            link
            fedilink
            -111 year ago

            So then we agree there is more than one correct date format.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          It happens a few times a month, when dealing with something important to make sure people understand, same reason as to why I sometimes say times in a 24h format.

      • eric
        link
        fedilink
        -10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not implying you can’t say “of” in English, but it’s common (and shorter) to say “Feb 29th.” It is not however correct to say “Feb 29th” in many other languages, which is why Europe made day first dates the regional standard. And just like with the imperial vs metric systems, England has shifted to more often use Europe’s standard rather than the one they came up with themselves.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Are you trolling or just incapable of acknowledging that you can speak a date differently than its written representation? The entire reason for any standard is just to ensure you’re working within a known/consistent framework. You can measure in imperial or metric but you can’t label an imperial or metric unit as the opposite just because you prefer it that way.

          If I hand you glass of milk with a skull and crossbones sticker on it why would you assume it’s harmful when in my region it’s used to signify its high calcium content? I can say “poison” or I can say “milk”, but a skull should never be interchangeably used.

          In the same way, a date written in a global standard format should always be immediately recognized as signifying ONE particular date, and you’re then free to localize it however you please.

          • eric
            link
            fedilink
            -51 year ago

            Not trolling. I just think all three formats are correct and I can’t understand why everyone must demand their way is the only correct way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      we speak or write February 29th 2023.

      oh, yeah? Remind me of the date of “America’s birthday” again?

      • eric
        link
        fedilink
        -81 year ago

        1776/07/04, which is commonly written July 4th 1776 as well as 4th of July 1776. All three ways are correct. What’s your point?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          I am engaging in what is commonly known as a joke, jape, jackanapery, tomfoolery, silliness or knavery.