@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-26 months agoi <3 statisticsmander.xyzmessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1767file-text
arrow-up1742imagei <3 statisticsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-26 months agomessage-square89fedilinkfile-text
Disclaimer: This is a joke. Ecofascism is obviously bad, kids. Don’t be that guy. https://theconversation.com/8-billion-people-why-trying-to-control-the-population-is-often-futile-and-harmful-194369
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•6 months agoWell it did cause the first and largest mass extinction event so far…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoSure but anthropogenic climate change is an issue of greenhouse gas accumulation rather than a lack of oxygen, no? Rather than there being too many people literally just using too much oxygen.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•6 months agoCO^2 production consumes oxygen from the atmosphere; Carbon capture that doesn’t make oxygen will leave that issue alive and well.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoI was joking. We wouldn’t be alive if that particular extinction even hadn’t happened.
Well it did cause the first and largest mass extinction event so far…
Sure but anthropogenic climate change is an issue of greenhouse gas accumulation rather than a lack of oxygen, no? Rather than there being too many people literally just using too much oxygen.
CO^2 production consumes oxygen from the atmosphere; Carbon capture that doesn’t make oxygen will leave that issue alive and well.
I was joking. We wouldn’t be alive if that particular extinction even hadn’t happened.