@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-26 months agoi <3 statisticsmander.xyzmessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1767file-text
arrow-up1742imagei <3 statisticsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-26 months agomessage-square89fedilinkfile-text
Disclaimer: This is a joke. Ecofascism is obviously bad, kids. Don’t be that guy. https://theconversation.com/8-billion-people-why-trying-to-control-the-population-is-often-futile-and-harmful-194369
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoSure but anthropogenic climate change is an issue of greenhouse gas accumulation rather than a lack of oxygen, no? Rather than there being too many people literally just using too much oxygen.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•6 months agoCO^2 production consumes oxygen from the atmosphere; Carbon capture that doesn’t make oxygen will leave that issue alive and well.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoI was joking. We wouldn’t be alive if that particular extinction even hadn’t happened.
Sure but anthropogenic climate change is an issue of greenhouse gas accumulation rather than a lack of oxygen, no? Rather than there being too many people literally just using too much oxygen.
CO^2 production consumes oxygen from the atmosphere; Carbon capture that doesn’t make oxygen will leave that issue alive and well.
I was joking. We wouldn’t be alive if that particular extinction even hadn’t happened.