• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    781 year ago

    except the israelis were the ones starting shit 7 decades ago

    hamas is just a convenient excuse for genocide

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        which side is really refusing negotiations: the ones getting armed by the biggest military power in the planet, with the intention of ethnic cleansing, or the ones getting their country leveled fighting with improvised bombs?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        291 year ago

        Ah yes. History began on October 7th. There is no context to anything involving anything prior to October 7th 2023.

        Although even looking at just October 7th and what has happened since… kind of elucidates what the fuck has been going on.

        Hell even 7 decades ago Einstein was looking at what was just starting and went “Well this is some Nazi shit.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            13
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Saying “this section of the planet belongs to a specific race because they’re fractionally descended from one of the people that lived there a long time ago” is dumb as fuck. Modern people have 0 connection to Jews that long ago and most modern Israeli Jews aren’t actually ethnically similar to Jews thousands of years ago, most Israelis are primarily European descendant or other non-Palestinian descendant.

            Modern Israelis are not the same group as the various historical groups referred to as “Jews”. Your logic is flawed.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Just a slight correction; something like 60 percent of modern Israelis are Mizrahi, meaning they are from the Middle East and have no European ancestry or connection to Europe. Ethnically they are very similar to the Palestinians and if you put them together in a mixed group, you probably wouldn’t be able to tell them apart based on appearance alone.

              There’s also no reason to think that Mizrahi Jews aren’t largely descended from the ancient Jewish population since wherever they’ve lived in the Middle East, they’ve never been fully integrated and have always been pretty insular. Most scholars think that the same is true to a lesser extent of Ashkenazi Jews as well, though obviously they have a lot more European ancestry.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                That’s all Israelis including non-Jews afaik, when we specify Israeli Jews the number is allegedly at least 50-60% being of mainly European descent.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            The more reasonable and manageable timeframe might be closer to living generations currently in existence.

            The hyperbole kind of misses its intended mark when itself misses the context of a call for context.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 year ago

        Total war is not just an abstract political move, it’s an immense suffering and deaths of dozens of thousands of civilians.

        It’s easy to play political mastermind from the safety and comfort of your home. People who witnessed war know full well what it entails, and they know it’s not just numbers and maps and politics.

        It’s blood. It’s broken families. It’s famine. It’s the destruction of everything they valued. It’s PTSD for just about everyone who managed to survive.

        Think twice before saying things like that. Please.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -41 year ago

          I’m simply describing the situation in Gaza for what it is, Total War. I’m not advocating for it, but I recognize that Israel is going to respond to October 7 as they see fit.

          Would you rather I described it in a way that didn’t hurt your fragile sensibilities?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            You claim “total war is justified”. I say it’s pretty much never justified.

            What kind of fragile sensibilities are you talking about here?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              The fact that I described the current situation as “Total war”. Seems to offend you. Should I say both sides are making a “fluffy”, would that make you feel better?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                Nope, you ignored my last message.

                You said, and I cite you here: “Total war on Gaza looks pretty damn justified to me.”

                This is total war, yes, wholeheartedly agreed here. It is not justified in any way, shape or form.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -11 year ago

                  Sorry it’s been a day between posting and responding. On top of that there are a lot of tools in this thread and it hard to keep every conversation straight.

                  But in short Israel is a sovereign nation whose citizens were just attacked in a large scale well coordinated manner. They have every right to go after the perpetrators. If total war and the leveling of Gaza is what it takes and they have the ability to execute it then so be it.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    And that’s where I and most other Palestine supporters strongly disagree.

                    For starters, being attacked doesn’t allow the country to breach the international treaties on the law of war. Civilian massacre and “leveling of Gaza” is a grave breach of the treaties and a war crime, it should not be supported and Netanyahu and Israeli military officials are waited for in Hague, where they need to give quite an explanation for what they’ve done (and certainly get arrested).

                    Second, the attack on Israel was carried out by a small militant group, to which the majority of Palestinians barely holds any relation. About 200 people were taken as PoW. Israel’s response on that was unproportionate, with dozens of thousands of civilians killed, misplaced, and taken as PoWs. Regular people, people who did not attack Israel, are now finding themselves among one of the most cruel and lawless wars of the 21st century, with nobody able to protect them.

                    People of Palestine did not deserve this. They are civilians, and under the law of war, they should never be touched. There is a reason international community recognizes those rules, and Israel just decided to not give a damn. Israel is currently carrying more unnecessary, malicious violence and extermination than any other country on Earth.

                    As I said, under any circumstances, total war is not justified, and the international community has long formalized that. This conflict has shown how many people lack basic humanity to be able to universally recognize basic human rights long written in international laws and conventions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        201 year ago

        200 dead from a terrorist attack committed by terrorists justifies 20,000 civilian deaths by carpet bombing and levelling entire communities?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -151 year ago

          If Hamas is wiped out then yes, that is what total war is.

          If Hamas really cared for the people under its authority, it would not have attacked nor would it use them as human shields.