• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 months ago

      Probably the reason they’re moving to a Web offering. They could just take down the binary files and be gpl compliant, this whole thing is so stupid

        • lad
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 months ago

          Yes, but if the code they took is not AGPL then this loophole still applies

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            311 months ago

            Yes, I meant more that AGPL was created to plug this particular loophole. As in, if it was AGPL, they couldn’t do this.

            • lad
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              That’s true

              Although I personally am not a fan of licences this strict, MIT+Apache2.0 seems good enough for me. Of course, that might change with time and precedents like this 😅