“There have been racial barriers, and it has been challenging to be accepted as Japanese.”

That’s what a tearful Carolina Shiino said in impeccable Japanese after she was crowned Miss Japan on Monday.

The 26-year-old model, who was born in Ukraine, moved to Japan at the age of five and was raised in Nagoya.

She is the first naturalised Japanese citizen to win the pageant, but her victory has re-ignited a debate on what it means to be Japanese.

While some recognised her victory as a “sign of the times”, others have said she does not look like what a “Miss Japan” should.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      515 months ago

      It isn’t called a genetics pagent. Beauty is already subjective enough without layering your myopic view of race on top of it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          155 months ago

          Well, according to whatever panel was judging this competition, she had all of those things. But you weren’t talking about that. You said she isn’t “physically or genetically” Japanese, and that that was what “pagents are about”.

    • DessertStorms
      link
      fedilink
      355 months ago

      Ah yes, the futile desperation to maintain “racial purity”, because that’s never turned out badly for anyone ever… 🙄🙄🙄

          • @[email protected]M
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            Removed, rule 5, and yeah, I’m removing the other comment too.

            Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!

            • 520
              link
              fedilink
              25 months ago

              Have you considered maybe that the Japanese are nothing like the Native Americans, and that what’s happening in Japan has nothing to do with racism against the Japanese?

              • DessertStorms
                link
                fedilink
                35 months ago

                Right? They invoke the genocide of Native Americans to defend the idea of Japanese racial purity being threatened by a single beauty pageant contestant, and I’m the one whitewashing… 🤦‍♀️

                • 520
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  It’s absolutely insane, especially when it comes from those who claim to want to preserve ethnic identities.

                  If they’re gonna invoke other national identities in conversation, the least they could do is learn about them. If anything drawing comparisons to ethnic cleansing over a fucking beauty pageant is more insensitive than pretty much anything else in this thread.

                  Other than their connotations that someone cannot be a real Japanese because of their skin colour, that reminds me a bit about America’s history of treating black people.

            • @[email protected]M
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              Removed, rule 5, and yeah, I’m removing the other comment too.

              Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!

    • LanternEverywhere
      link
      fedilink
      29
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      What the heck are you talking about. Beauty pageants aren’t about ethnicity. This is farrrrr from the first time that a pageant winner is a different ethnicity than the predominant ethnicity of a country.

        • 520
          link
          fedilink
          19
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Oh fucking get over yourself.

          The Japanese are hardly an oppressed people, at least by outsiders. They’re a first world country. With their own customs and culture.

          The only dangers to their identity have been those of their own societal making.

          Japan’s native population has been in critical freefall for a long time not because of any white person interference, but because their culture has become increasingly incompatible with family life for a significant amount of their population. If you thought America had an out-of-whack work culture, your jaw would hit the floor when you see what salarymen and salarywomen over there go through.

          It’s not like they’ve been pushed out by a colonial force with some manifest destiny bullshit. The problem here simply isn’t whitey.

            • 520
              link
              fedilink
              9
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              They’re being forced, by nothing more than the mere reality of their situation, to accept outside culture because their societal failures have led to their own population death spiral.

              No one forced their hand or made them take on such damaging traditions and policies. No one is forcing the Japanese to take on elements of other cultures.

              Try doing a bit of research before spouting nonsense theories.

            • FaceDeer
              link
              fedilink
              45 months ago

              They are being “forced” to accept outside culture because their inside culture has led them to a demographic death spiral. Not by any action initiated by outsiders. If outsiders were capable of forcing Japanese culture to change there are plenty of other things that would be changing that aren’t.

              They could always choose to continue following that spiral to oblivion, I suppose. Or they could reform the aspects of their culture that have led them there. Accepting immigration is one of the ways they could do that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              205 months ago

              Whitewashing… you keep using that word. I don’t think it means what you think it means.

              White washing means to attempt to change history to make something seem less bad than it actually was, or who someone was.

              Do you mean cultural appropriation? Though saying it like that kinda damns your point of view.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  105 months ago

                  Oh golly, please amalgamate a term for it right now. You’re clearly the best person for the job with your enlightened (read: narrow) view of race.

                  • @[email protected]M
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    15 months ago

                    Removed under rule 5:

                    Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!