Trump’s legal team also tried to throw cold water on the idea in a filing earlier this week, writing that the “events of January 6 were not an ‘insurrection’ as they did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow or resist the U.S. government.”

Trump disagrees, apparently.

“They kept saying about what I said right after the insurrection,” he said outside Mar-a-Lago after arguments concluded in Washington, D.C. “I think it was an insurrection caused by Nancy Pelosi.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      359 months ago

      I really thought in 2016 Bernie would splinter the democrats and we’d have a true left party. I also thought trump would create a new party on the right and the republicans would go back to being republicans. Can you imagine a 4 party system!

      To my surprise, the trump dragged the republicans even further to the right, and the democrats moved even more center-right to appease ex-republicans. So the whole nation just moved right, which is sad.

      • iquanyin
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        it’s been moving to the right my whole lifetime. i’m 64. we’re not right at the fascist line, with our right wing party actually over the line, and no far left at all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        Wouldn’t last… you’d end up like Australia where they just form coalitions and it’s the same result as if they never split

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        The Republicans recently had a split with the Tea Party, that’s where we got Ted Cruz from. Then they lost the election to Obama and came back to republicans

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      English
      129 months ago

      What better options? What names are well known to people? What people that are well known can overcome incumbency bias? Do any have literal decades of experience in congress and the white house?

      I would have preferred Bernie but throwing out names only a small percentage of the electorate will know is a fools gamble. And the DNC using marketing to get them well know would have been a huge waste of times and resources to build someone up when there’s already a good candidate sitting in the oval office. You’re not going to throw out a sitting President unless he’s WILDLY unpopular.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        149 months ago

        Barack Obama wasn’t very well known when he ran for president t. And he won twice.

        I think the point is that both the Dems and GOP are pigeon-holing themselves by only allowing one candidate to run. Why does it have to be that way? So what if there are 10 dems and 22 GOP to choose from? Or whatever.

        Make them actually have to work for it and let the American people decide. Scrap the first past the post rule and ditch the electoral college. Give the people their voices back. The way it works right now does not work. It’s high time everyone just admits to it.

        • Neato
          link
          fedilink
          English
          49 months ago

          He wasn’t trying to primary an incumbent either.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        He is wildly unpopular. A majority of Americans thinks he is too old to be an effective president. This has nothing to do with his record, but with the simple biological fact that our minds decay as we reach our 80s.

        For that same reason Trump is a terrible candidate as well, and I actually am not worried that a younger candidate with some name recognition will be able to defeat him. I am much more worried about Biden.

      • bbbbbbbbbbb
        link
        fedilink
        119 months ago

        Gather every D senator and congressman into a giant circle and toss a stone into the air. Whoever it hits is likely better.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          Granted, the odds are in your favor, but there are definitely some much worse options in that crowd.

          Are any of them running? Actually, forget that. Anyone currently running is probably a moron.

          Do they have the name recognition and wide appeal? Can they raise the money and give a good speech? Can they argue with a madman and win? Are any of them leaders, and if so, where the fuck have they been?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          No it absolutely could not. She doesnt want it and this is a racist and misogynist country. The GOP literally believes she’s a trans dude and their media tells them that every day.

          Stop trying to make MO happen. It’s not gonna happen.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          fedilink
          59 months ago

          I would vote for him for anything, but he doesn’t want the job, and he isn’t running. Those are two important prerequisites to voting for the guy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      Our system rewards fund raisers. Why is it someone who able to raise money should run the country, I don’t know. Just how it is set up.