qaz to Mildly [email protected]English • 4 months agoThe document specifying the usage of ISO8601 doesn't use ISO8601lemmy.worldmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1209
arrow-up1209imageThe document specifying the usage of ISO8601 doesn't use ISO8601lemmy.worldqaz to Mildly [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•edit-24 months agoISO uses a weird separator ‘T’ between the time and the date. eg. 2018-04-01T15:20:15.000-0700 RFC3339 can have a space instead which is a bit more readable: eg. 2020-12-09 16:09:53+00:00
minus-square@anemoia_onelinkEnglish7•4 months agoThey aren’t open standards like rfc, you have to pay to access them: https://www.iso.org/store.html It’s similar to the UN in membership, and in my opinion the member states should pay to allow the standards to be open
what’s wrong with ISO?
ISO uses a weird separator ‘T’ between the time and the date. eg. 2018-04-01T15:20:15.000-0700
RFC3339 can have a space instead which is a bit more readable: eg. 2020-12-09 16:09:53+00:00
They aren’t open standards like rfc, you have to pay to access them:
https://www.iso.org/store.html
It’s similar to the UN in membership, and in my opinion the member states should pay to allow the standards to be open