• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    44 months ago

    Yeah that does sound like a failure. But also different time different place. Was there a Fentanyl epidemic of this scale 10 years ago in Florida? If the treatment options save just one person’s life, is it still a failure? Should we just say “yep nothing works, there’s no solution to daily ODs on the streets of the city.”?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      204 months ago

      Your right, 10 years ago people weren’t using welfare money on fent, they were using medicaid money on RXs for 180 OC30s.

      The solution is to end the drug war.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        54 months ago

        I always wonder why the disaster of massive amounts of legally available opiates is brought up as an argument to stop the restrictions on drugs altogether

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Yeah, it’s like “Hey, look at the great improvement to my life since I’ve started taking 15 oxys per day! Everyone should be doing this!”

          Recreational use is one thing, but continuous, institutionally backed dependence is a whole different ballgame.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        Yeah, not that that’s ideal, but at least the OCs weren’t turning them into permanently mentally and physically crippled zombies, or suddenly killing them like fent does.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          64 months ago

          No, the Oxy just pushed people to fent once they could no longer get or afford their fix from the pharmacy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      “Yes it was a failure but have you thought about how this time will be different because reasons?”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        Because it’s a much more destructive drug, in a completely different state and city, with completely different demographics, political climate, and education level? 15 years into the future?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          Oh so you think everyone in CA on benefits in on drugs or something? The base idea remains the same. Don’t hide welfare behind drug testing it isn’t worth it

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            No I don’t think that and I never said that. Please don’t try and put words in my mouth.

            To be blunt, I think that the people in California, today, are much better equipped to take on this issue than the people in Florida were 15 years ago.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              24 months ago

              All those drug addicted welfare queens in CA need to rot amirite? Since you hate welfare and the people on it.

              That’s putting words in your mouth. Keep making things up tho dude I’m sure it’ll take you far.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                Oh man he really showed me, by putting more words in my mouth… lol. I’m not going to wrestle with a pig here, Adolf! Enjoy your internet forum mud slinging battles!

            • @rambaroo
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              The fact that they passed this law despite the same kind of law literally never working ever anywhere just proves how wrong you are. It’s yet another stupid easy-sounding solution that makes people feel smug but won’t work

              Californians are just as dumb as Floridians apparently. So dumb that they can’t even learn from Florida’s big dumb mistakes, and probably were never aware of them in the first place.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Did Florida’s law provision for treatment options? If not, then maybe it really isn’t the same “stupid easy-sounding solution”. I think that if you should take some time to read the article and understand the measure that was voted on, before you call the entire population of California as dumb as that of Florida…

                From the article:

                Breed’s office has said the measure was intentionally designed to be flexible on the treatment component. Treatment options could range from out-patient services to a prescription for buprenorphine, a medication used to treat addiction. They noted it doesn’t include a requirement for participants to remain sober, recognizing that people often lapse in recovery and shouldn’t be kicked out of the program for a slip-up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      save just one person’s life […]

      Bullshit. It’s entirely possible to save one person while harming many others.