• Doc Avid Mornington
      link
      fedilink
      English
      378 months ago

      The article literally tells you that this was done before, to give us the 40 day standard we now have. It worked before, and the article also points out that other countries have recently reduced work weeks under 40 hours. How is it hard to imagine that something that factually has happened could happen?

        • Doc Avid Mornington
          link
          fedilink
          English
          258 months ago

          I mean, they actually can. That’s a completely facetious argument. Laws can set standards without defining everything. It’s done all the time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 months ago

          The US government isn’t party to private contracts. Can’t dictate terms in that manner.

          Nonsense. Try writing a contract that makes someone your slave and see how enforceable it is. How do you think minimum wage works? Walmart is paying that out of the goodness of their heart? No… they are forced to by the feds.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          The US government isn’t party to private contracts

          Learn what at-will employment is and how much of the US is stuck with it

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 months ago

              If you’re fully aware of what at-will is then you’d know saying

              The US government isn’t party to private contracts

              Is silly when the overwhelming majority of employees in this country do not have a private contract for employment

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      168 months ago

      Hopefully it reclassifies weekly work hour threshold to be considered for full time benefits. Either way it’s going to be a bumpy ride. At least someone is trying something

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      I suppose we would have to raise the minimum wage, and since neither party wants that, it’s dead in the water.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      Yeah, I don’t understand how the “no loss of pay” part is implemented either.

      Even if there is something in the bill that requires overtime pay, that’s just a multiplier to the base wage. What keeps an unscrupulous employer from just dropping the base rate by 20%?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          And add to that, anybody who is already salaried is just going to end up working the same 40+ that they’re already doing.

          Out of all those jobs I had, only 1 gave me anything for OT, and that was just TOIL, which is nice but not sufficient when you’re the only person in your position.