• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    43 months ago

    can prove they’re short-sighted;

    how? what methodology is available to you to prove such an accusation?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      EDIT: Observe the user below spamming multiple replies to the same comment. This is part of the gaslighting gish-gallop tactic I’ve noted. There is a user here I suspect of having many alt accounts and who frequently does this. I encourage you to report them for spam.

      what methodology is available to you to prove such an accusation?

      If I may, a thing called logic.

      • If your goal is to minimize genocide, both in Palestine and Ukraine.
      • If your goal is to ensure that we don’t fall further into fascism.
      • If the choices on the ballot in November are a constant, regardless of anything else that happens.
      • If you understand the nature of entropy in that maintaining let alone building-upon a trillion-piece puzzle is exceedingly more taxing than smashing it.
      • If other guy is significantly-worse for Ukrainians, Palestinians, US, and the World.
      • If you understand the mathematical trend of FPTP and the Spoiler Effect.

      … Then one understands the logical choice is voting for Biden and doing anything else from not voting, voting Republican, voting 3rd-party, writing-in – is utterly self-defeating and short-sighted to the aforementioned goals.

      If you don’t understand these things, then yes, one might have built their ardent beliefs atop a house of cards.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          123 months ago

          No, but voting for Trump or helping him win by hiding behind a 3rd party candidate will advance fascism guaranteed. But please, continue astroturfing this thread with your repeating, broken argument.

            • Jaysyn
              link
              fedilink
              83 months ago

              LOL, if you could prove Duvinger’s Law wrong you’d be famous, but you’re not.

              You’re very likely a Trump supporter stirring shit with those facile arguments.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                6
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                You know what this sort of rhetorical technique they’re using reminds me of? Sovereign citizens lmao.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                33 months ago

                You’re very likely a Trump supporter stirring shit with those facile arguments.

                baby, i’m an anarchist.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                23 months ago

                LOL, if you could prove Duvinger’s Law wrong you’d be famous, but you’re not.

                duverger’s “law” has no predictive value at all. it’s post-hoc storytelling. you can’t prove it wrong because it’s a useless tautology.