• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      117 months ago

      I would argue that QA saves you money. In that, it detects faulty products and in doing so limit liability.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        107 months ago

        I agree whole heartedly, the “it doesn’t make money” argument is common and the fight to do proper QA is rarely won.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          The problem is QA vs QC. Quality control means you actually have to do stuff. Quality assurance just means “I assure you, the quality is good ;)”

      • gimpchrist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67 months ago

        If you don’t have a QA you run the risk of having to rebuild the entire bar from scratch