• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    117 months ago

    I would argue that QA saves you money. In that, it detects faulty products and in doing so limit liability.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      107 months ago

      I agree whole heartedly, the “it doesn’t make money” argument is common and the fight to do proper QA is rarely won.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The problem is QA vs QC. Quality control means you actually have to do stuff. Quality assurance just means “I assure you, the quality is good ;)”

    • gimpchrist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 months ago

      If you don’t have a QA you run the risk of having to rebuild the entire bar from scratch