The Picard Maneuver to [email protected] • 7 months agoThe Associated Press "dehumanizes" the Frenchlemmy.worldmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1445
arrow-up1445imageThe Associated Press "dehumanizes" the Frenchlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver to [email protected] • 7 months agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•7 months agoThe tweet is referring to saying “The [group] are xyz” instead of saying “[group] people are xyz”
minus-squareThe Picard ManeuverOPlinkfedilink8•7 months agoBoth versions have the same meaning to me. Sometimes I think we change things just to feel like we’re doing something.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•7 months agoOf course it has the same meaning. The guide is about how to rephrase the same thing, not about changing what you write entirely.
minus-squareThe Picard ManeuverOPlinkfedilink6•7 months agoI mean that one doesn’t sound “dehumanizing” to my ear, like the guide suggests.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink14•7 months agoWording like “the poor” makes being poor an identity. While “people who are poor” identifies them as people first. It’s a subtle difference, but it has proven impact on general public perception of certain groups.
minus-squarequeermunist she/herlinkfedilink6•7 months agoOnly dehumanize people who deserve it, like the rich.
The tweet is referring to saying “The [group] are xyz” instead of saying “[group] people are xyz”
Both versions have the same meaning to me. Sometimes I think we change things just to feel like we’re doing something.
Of course it has the same meaning. The guide is about how to rephrase the same thing, not about changing what you write entirely.
I mean that one doesn’t sound “dehumanizing” to my ear, like the guide suggests.
Wording like “the poor” makes being poor an identity. While “people who are poor” identifies them as people first. It’s a subtle difference, but it has proven impact on general public perception of certain groups.
Only dehumanize people who deserve it, like the rich.