• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1247 months ago

      Yeah, I’m an embedded software developer myself and yeah, when we architect our code we have safety critical sections identified with software safety reviews and we always go with the assumption that we’re going to run into that one guy who’s the living embodiment of Murphy’s law and go from there with that design to minimize the potential for injury and death.

      Can’t imagine who the hell is in charge of the software safety reviews there that let that pass.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          597 months ago

          They did, but Elon asked one of them for a latte and they brought him one with 2% instead of oatmilk so he gutted the whole department.

          /s, because it might be to be specified.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          Whose company that sends a poop emoji as a response when the PR department is emailed? Hmm, this us a tough question. . .

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        347 months ago

        Same in the medical devices industry. We have whole teams of non-developers whose job is to find out when and why a surgeon can be a moron. The code is more difficult to write, but it’s way better and more robust.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      617 months ago

      “Smart” may as well be synonymous with “unpredictable”. I don’t need my computer to be smart. I need it to be predictable, consistent, and undemanding.

    • toofpic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 months ago

      “Oh my, the cake box/finger/dog was in the way, but thanks for automation, the door didn’t close!”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      And also every additional kind of complexity (which stacks BTW) makes you more dependent on the vendor (good for them, bad for you) and on doing things exactly as their imagined user (because it’s disproportionately your problem as laws don’t seem to work in making it theirs).

      Distributism is actually a very good political ideology. Sad it’s associated with Catholic religion, because it correctly generalized the principles making democracies and markets and cultures work.